Effects of a Low-glycemic Load Diet in Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Am J Clin Nutr

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Nutritional Sciences

Date 2010 Oct 22

PMID 20962162

Citations 38

Authors

Erinn T Rhodes

Dorota B Pawlak

Tamara C Takoudes

Cara B Ebbeling

Henry A Feldman

Margaret M Lovesky

Emily A Cooke

Michael M Leidig

David S Ludwig

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The optimal diet for pregnancy that is complicated by excessive weight is unknown.

Objective: We aimed to examine the effects of a low-glycemic load (low-GL) diet in overweight and obese pregnant women.

Design: We randomly assigned 46 overweight or obese pregnant women to receive a low-GL or a low-fat diet. Participants received carbohydrate-rich foods, fats, and snack foods through home delivery or study visits. The primary outcome was birth weight z score. Other endpoints included infant anthropometric measurements, gestational duration, maternal weight gain, and maternal metabolic parameters.

Results: There were no significant differences in birth weight z score or other measures of infant adiposity between groups. However, in the low-GL compared with the low-fat group, gestational duration was longer (mean ± SD: 39.3 ± 1.1 compared with 37.9 ± 3.1 wk; P = 0.05) and fewer deliveries occurred at ≤ 38.0 wk (13% compared with 48%, P = 0.02; with exclusion of planned cesarean deliveries: 5% compared with 53%; P = 0.002). Adjusted head circumference was greater in the low-GL group (35.0 ± 0.8 compared with 34.2 ± 1.3 cm, P = 0.01). Women in the low-GL group had smaller increases in triglycerides [median (interquartile range): 49 (19, 70) compared with 93 (34, 129) mg/dL; P = 0.03] and total cholesterol [13 (0, 36) compared with 33 (22, 56) mg/dL, P = 0.04] and a greater decrease in C-reactive protein [-2.5 (-5.5, -0.7) compared with -0.4 (-1.4, 1.5) mg/dL, P = 0.007].

Conclusions: A low-GL diet resulted in longer pregnancy duration, greater infant head circumference, and improved maternal cardiovascular risk factors. Large-scale studies are warranted to evaluate whether dietary intervention during pregnancy aimed at lowering GL may be useful in the prevention of prematurity and other adverse maternal and infant outcomes. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00364403.

Citing Articles

Gestational weight gain and increased risk of cesarean delivery across body mass index categories.

McElfish P, Ayers B, Hawley N, Caldwell A, Porter A, Macechko M AJOG Glob Rep. 2025; 5(1):100445.

PMID: 40027475 PMC: 11869019. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100445.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional interventions to prevent of gestational hypertension or/and preeclampsia among healthy pregnant women.

Imanpour V, Khoshhali M, Goodarzi-Khoigani M, Kelishadi R J Res Med Sci. 2023; 28:25.

PMID: 37213454 PMC: 10199370. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_89_22.

Effects of nutritional interventions during pregnancy on birth, child health and development outcomes: A systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Lassi Z, Padhani Z, Rabbani A, Rind F, Salam R, Bhutta Z Campbell Syst Rev. 2023; 17(2):e1150.

PMID: 37131924 PMC: 8356342. DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1150.

The effect of low glycemic index diet on the reproductive and clinical profile in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saadati N, Haidari F, Barati M, Nikbakht R, Mirmomeni G, Rahim F Heliyon. 2021; 7(11):e08338.

PMID: 34820542 PMC: 8600081. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08338.

Effect of a Low-Glycemic Load Diet Intervention on Maternal and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Pregnant Women.

Goletzke J, De Haene J, Stotland N, Murphy E, Perez-Rodriguez M, King J Nutrients. 2021; 13(3).

PMID: 33652705 PMC: 7996780. DOI: 10.3390/nu13030748.

References

Shaw G, Quach T, Nelson V, Carmichael S, Schaffer D, Selvin S . Neural tube defects associated with maternal periconceptional dietary intake of simple sugars and glycemic index. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78(5):972-8. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/78.5.972. View

Franz M, Bantle J, Beebe C, Brunzell J, Chiasson J, Garg A . Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(1):148-98. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.148. View

Atkinson F, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller J . International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(12):2281-3. PMC: 2584181. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1239. View

Kaiser L, Allen L . Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102(10):1479-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90327-5. View

Clapp 3rd J . Effect of dietary carbohydrate on the glucose and insulin response to mixed caloric intake and exercise in both nonpregnant and pregnant women. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21 Suppl 2:B107-12. View

Olsen I, Groveman S, Lawson M, Clark R, Zemel B . New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(2):e214-24. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913. View

Catalano P, Tyzbir E, Roman N, Amini S, SIMS E . Longitudinal changes in insulin release and insulin resistance in nonobese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165(6 Pt 1):1667-72. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90012-g. View

Buchanan T, Metzger B, Freinkel N, Bergman R . Insulin sensitivity and B-cell responsiveness to glucose during late pregnancy in lean and moderately obese women with normal glucose tolerance or mild gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162(4):1008-14. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91306-w. View

Huda S, Brodie L, Sattar N . Obesity in pregnancy: prevalence and metabolic consequences. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 15(2):70-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.09.006. View

10.

Yazdy M, Liu S, Mitchell A, Werler M . Maternal dietary glycemic intake and the risk of neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171(4):407-14. PMC: 2842193. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp395. View

11.

Tita A, Landon M, Spong C, Lai Y, Leveno K, Varner M . Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(2):111-20. PMC: 2811696. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803267. View

12.

Liu S, Manson J, Stampfer M, Holmes M, Hu F, Hankinson S . Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73(3):560-6. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.3.560. View

13.

Dahlgren J . Pregnancy and insulin resistance. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008; 4(2):149-52. DOI: 10.1089/met.2006.4.149. View

14.

Asbee S, Jenkins T, Butler J, White J, Elliot M, Rutledge A . Preventing excessive weight gain during pregnancy through dietary and lifestyle counseling: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113(2 Pt 1):305-12. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318195baef. View

15.

Ludwig D . The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2002; 287(18):2414-23. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2414. View

16.

Oken E, Gillman M . Fetal origins of obesity. Obes Res. 2003; 11(4):496-506. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.69. View

17.

Siega-Riz A, King J . Position of the American Dietetic Association and American Society for Nutrition: obesity, reproduction, and pregnancy outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(5):918-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.020. View

18.

Pereira M, Swain J, Goldfine A, Rifai N, Ludwig D . Effects of a low-glycemic load diet on resting energy expenditure and heart disease risk factors during weight loss. JAMA. 2004; 292(20):2482-90. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.20.2482. View

19.

Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Mullie P, Vansant G . Effect of lifestyle intervention on dietary habits, physical activity, and gestational weight gain in obese pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 91(2):373-80. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28166. View

20.

Clapp J, Lopez B . Low-versus high-glycemic index diets in women: effects on caloric requirement, substrate utilization and insulin sensitivity. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2008; 5(3):231-42. DOI: 10.1089/met.2006.0040. View