» Articles » PMID: 20888418

The Search for an Optimal DNA, RNA, and Protein Detection by in Situ Hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, and Solution-based Methods

Overview
Journal Methods
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Oct 5
PMID 20888418
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical trials and correlative laboratory research are increasingly reliant upon archived paraffin-embedded samples. Therefore, the proper processing of biological samples is an important step to sample preservation and for downstream analyses like the detection of a wide variety of targets including micro RNA, DNA and proteins. This paper analyzed the question whether routine fixation of cells and tissues in 10% buffered formalin is optimal for in situ and solution phase analyses by comparing this fixative to a variety of cross linking and alcohol (denaturing) fixatives. We examined the ability of nine commonly used fixative regimens to preserve cell morphology and DNA/RNA/protein quality for these applications. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and bovine papillomavirus (BPV)-infected tissues and cells were used as our model systems. Our evaluation showed that the optimal fixative in cell preparations for molecular hybridization techniques was "gentle" fixative with a cross-linker such as paraformaldehyde or a short incubation in 10% buffered formalin. The optimal fixatives for tissue were either paraformaldehyde or low concentration of formalin (5% of formalin). Methanol was the best of the non cross-linking fixatives for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. For PCR-based detection of DNA or RNA, some denaturing fixatives like acetone and methanol as well as "gentle" cross-linking fixatives like paraformaldehyde out-performed other fixatives. Long term fixation was not proposed for DNA/RNA-based assays. The typical long-term fixation of cells and tissues in 10% buffered formalin is not optimal for combined analyses by in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, or--if one does not have unfixed tissues--solution phase PCR. Rather, we recommend short term less intense cross linking fixation if one wishes to use the same cells/tissue for in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and solution phase PCR.

Citing Articles

Effect of formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedded tissue storage times on RNAscope in situ hybridization signal amplification.

Colburn M, Delaney M, Anchor G, Terio K J Vet Diagn Invest. 2024; 36(4):498-505.

PMID: 38650110 PMC: 11185121. DOI: 10.1177/10406387241245777.


Using In Situ Padlock Probe Technology to Detect mRNA Splice Variants in Tumor Cells.

Hofmann L, Kroneis T, El-Heliebi A Methods Mol Biol. 2020; 2148:361-378.

PMID: 32394394 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0623-0_23.


Detecting G protein-coupled receptor complexes in postmortem human brain with proximity ligation assay and a Bayesian classifier.

Zhu Y, Meszaros J, Walle R, Fan R, Sun Z, Dwork A Biotechniques. 2019; 68(3):122-129.

PMID: 31859535 PMC: 7092707. DOI: 10.2144/btn-2019-0083.


Next-Generation Sequencing Coupled With Hybridization: A Novel Diagnostic Platform to Investigate Swine Emerging Pathogens and New Variants of Endemic Viruses.

Resende T, Marshall Lund L, Rossow S, Vannucci F Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6:403.

PMID: 31803766 PMC: 6873589. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00403.


Elucidating the Burden of HIV in Tissues Using Multiplexed Immunofluorescence and In Situ Hybridization: Methods for the Single-Cell Phenotypic Characterization of Cells Harboring HIV In Situ.

Vasquez J, Hussien R, Aguilar-Rodriguez B, Junger H, Dobi D, Henrich T J Histochem Cytochem. 2018; 66(6):427-446.

PMID: 29462571 PMC: 5977441. DOI: 10.1369/0022155418756848.


References
1.
Emmert-Buck M, Strausberg R, Krizman D, Bonaldo M, Bonner R, Bostwick D . Molecular profiling of clinical tissue specimens: feasibility and applications. Am J Pathol. 2000; 156(4):1109-15. PMC: 1876878. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64979-6. View

2.
Chalret du Rieu M, Torrisani J, Selves J, Al Saati T, Souque A, Dufresne M . MicroRNA-21 is induced early in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma precursor lesions. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(4):603-12. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.137364. View

3.
Werner M, Chott A, Fabiano A, Battifora H . Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24(7):1016-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200007000-00014. View

4.
Schiller J, Lowy D . Vaccines to prevent infections by oncoviruses. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010; 64:23-41. PMC: 6264788. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134019. View

5.
Gillespie J, Best C, Bichsel V, Cole K, Greenhut S, Hewitt S . Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies. Am J Pathol. 2002; 160(2):449-57. PMC: 1850633. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64864-X. View