» Articles » PMID: 20852322

Malaysian and Thai Smokers' Beliefs About the Harmfulness of 'light' and Menthol Cigarettes

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Sep 21
PMID 20852322
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study explored the extent to which Malaysian and Thai smokers believe "light" and menthol cigarettes are less harmful than "regular" cigarettes and the correlates of these beliefs.

Methods: The study used data from wave 1 of the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey. 2006 adult smokers (95.3% male) from Malaysia and 2000 adult smokers (94.5% male) from Thailand were interviewed face to face in 2005.

Results: 29% of Malaysian respondents reported currently smoking light cigarettes and 14% menthols, with 19% agreeing that lights are less harmful and 16% agreeing that menthols are less harmful. 38% of Thai respondents reported currently smoking light cigarettes and 19% menthols, with 46% agreeing that lights are less harmful and 35% agreeing that menthols are less harmful. Malaysian smokers reporting current use of light or menthol cigarettes were more likely to believe that they are less harmful. Reported use of lights did not relate to beliefs for Thai respondents. The belief that light and/or menthol cigarettes are less harmful was strongly related to the belief that they have smoother smoke.

Conclusions: The experience of smoother smoke is likely to produce some level of belief in reduced harm, regardless of how brands are labelled and whether or not Federal Trade Commission FTC/International Organisation for Standardisation tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yield figures are used.

Citing Articles

Prevalence, perceptions and factors associated with menthol cigarette smoking: findings from the ITC Kenya and Zambia Surveys.

Kaai S, Fong G, Ongango J, Goma F, Meng G, Craig L Tob Control. 2022; 32(6):709-714.

PMID: 35459749 PMC: 10646928. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057100.


Australian Smokers' Sensory Experiences and Beliefs Associated with Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarettes.

Mancuso S, Brennan E, Dunstone K, Vittiglia A, Durkin S, Thrasher J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11).

PMID: 34063735 PMC: 8196669. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115501.


Assessing cigarette packaging and labelling policy effects on early adolescents: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Barrientos-Gutierrez I, Islam F, Cho Y, Salloum R, Louviere J, Arillo-Santillan E Tob Control. 2020; .

PMID: 32665358 PMC: 7855531. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055463.


'It has candy. You need to press on it': young adults' perceptions of flavoured cigarettes in the Philippines.

Brown J, Zhu M, Moran M, Hoe C, Frejas F, Cohen J Tob Control. 2020; 30(3):293-298.

PMID: 32447317 PMC: 8077215. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055524.


Menthol and flavor capsule cigarettes in the Philippines: A comparison of pack design.

Brown J, Smith K, Zhu M, Moran M, Hoe C, Cohen J Tob Induc Dis. 2019; 17:76.

PMID: 31768168 PMC: 6843184. DOI: 10.18332/tid/112718.


References
1.
Sutton C, Robinson R . The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6 Suppl 1:S83-91. DOI: 10.1080/14622203310001649504. View

2.
Wayne G, Connolly G . Application, function, and effects of menthol in cigarettes: a survey of tobacco industry documents. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6 Suppl 1:S43-54. DOI: 10.1080/14622203310001649513. View

3.
Gray N . Reflections on the saga of tar content: why did we measure the wrong thing?. Tob Control. 2000; 9(1):90-4. PMC: 1748297. DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.1.90. View

4.
Gray N . Low-tar cigarettes: bane or benefit. Cancer Detect Prev. 1987; 10(3-4):187-92. View

5.
Gardiner P . The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004; 6 Suppl 1:S55-65. DOI: 10.1080/14622200310001649478. View