» Articles » PMID: 12473429

What Smokers Believe About Light and Ultralight Cigarettes

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2002 Dec 11
PMID 12473429
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the knowledge of smokers and ex-smokers about light cigarettes and nicotine yields and their perception of the risk of lung cancer, and to identify the characteristics of smokers of light cigarettes.

Methods: Mail survey in a population sample of 494 smokers and exsmokers in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1999.

Results: Participants were on average 40 years old, and 49% were men. They estimated that one would have to smoke two light cigarettes or four ultralight cigarettes in order to inhale the same amount of nicotine as that in one regular cigarette. Most participants (60%) answered that the risk of lung cancer was the same, but 27% answered that this risk was lower in smokers of light cigarettes than in smokers of regular cigarettes. The most frequent answer (41% of answers) to an open-ended question on the meaning of the number of milligrams of nicotine printed on cigarette packs was that this number indicated the nicotine content in cigarettes, rather than a machine-determined yield in smoke. In a multivariate model, smoking mild, light, or ultralight (vs regular) cigarettes was associated with females, a lower Fagerström dependence score, an intention to quit smoking, and an intention to decrease cigarette consumption.

Conclusions: Many smokers choose light cigarettes because they think that such cigarettes are safer or less addictive. The public should be further informed of the meaning and purpose of cigarette labels.

Citing Articles

Organic, Earth-Friendly Tobacco With a Charcoal Filter and Smooth Taste: A Randomized Experiment Testing Effects of Natural American Spirit's "Sky" Cigarette Advertising on Consumer Perceptions.

Gratale S, Pearson J, Mercincavage M, Wackowski O Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 26(2):161-168.

PMID: 37349148 PMC: 10803116. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad099.


Marketing Influences on Perceptions of Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Johnson A, Mays D, Villanti A, Niaura R, Rehberg K, Phan L Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21(Suppl 1):S117-S124.

PMID: 31867656 PMC: 6939778. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz167.


Attitudinal Spillover from Misleading Natural Cigarette Marketing: An Experiment Examining Current and Former Smokers' Support for Tobacco Industry Regulation.

Gratale S, Sangalang A, Maloney E, Cappella J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19).

PMID: 31547517 PMC: 6801407. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193554.


Recommendations for the Appropriate Structure, Communication, and Investigation of Tobacco Harm Reduction Claims. An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Leone F, Carlsen K, Chooljian D, Crotty Alexander L, Detterbeck F, Eakin M Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198(8):e90-e105.

PMID: 30320525 PMC: 6943880. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201808-1443ST.


Perceived nicotine content of reduced nicotine content cigarettes is a correlate of perceived health risks.

Pacek L, McClernon F, Denlinger-Apte R, Mercincavage M, Strasser A, Dermody S Tob Control. 2017; 27(4):420-426.

PMID: 28735272 PMC: 6134393. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053689.