Smokers' Beliefs About "Light" and "Ultra Light" Cigarettes

Overview

Journal Tob Control

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2001 Dec 12

PMID 11740040

Citations 85

Authors

S Shiffman

J L Pillitteri

S L Burton

J M Rohay

J G Gitchell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess beliefs about the tar and nicotine delivery characteristics and health benefits of Light and Ultra Light cigarettes among cigarette smokers.

Design: Random digit dialed telephone survey conducted in September 1999.

Subjects: Daily smokers (n = 2120) of Regular (46%), Light (39%), and Ultra Light (15%) cigarettes in the USA. The sample was weighted to match the US smoker population on age, sex, and ethnicity.

Main Outcome Measures: Beliefs about Light and Ultra Light cigarettes were summarised on three dimensions: Safety (reduced health risk), Delivery (lowered tar and nicotine delivery), and Sensation (less harsh).

Results: Most smokers believed Lights and Ultra Lights were less harsh and delivered less tar and nicotine. On average, smokers believed that Lights afforded a 25% reduction in risk, and Ultra Lights a 33% reduction in risk. Light and Ultra Light cigarette smokers evaluated the risks of their own cigarette types more favourably. Light smokers had greater interest in quitting than Ultra Light smokers. Quitting intention was modestly related to beliefs about these cigarettes. Believing that Lights and Ultra Lights delivered less tar and nicotine and that they were less harsh each independently contributed to the belief that these cigarettes were safer.

Conclusions: Many Light and Ultra Light smokers believe that smoking these cigarettes impart a substantial health benefit, due in part to their experience that these cigarettes are less harsh and the belief that these cigarettes deliver less tar.

Citing Articles

Perceptions of the Addictiveness of Low-Nicotine Cigarettes Versus Typical Cigarettes and Exposure to Tobacco Industry-Sponsored Corrective Campaign.

Chido-Amajuoyi O, Mantey D, Igbinomwanhia E, Omega-Njemnobi O, Onyeaka H, Yu R Subst Use Misuse. 2024; 59(10):1511-1518.

PMID: 38831538 PMC: 11249086. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360100.

Believability of messaging concerning a hypothetical product standard to lower a constituent in cigarettes or smokeless tobacco among U.S. Adults who use tobacco.

Venrick S, Margolis K, Bernat J, Donaldson E, Pepper J, Eggers M Prev Med Rep. 2024; 37:102544.

PMID: 38169982 PMC: 10758972. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102544.

Protecting public health and the environment: towards a general ban on cellulose acetate cigarette filters in the European Union.

Everaert S, Schoeters G, Lardon F, Janssens A, van Larebeke N, Raquez J Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1282655.

PMID: 38026410 PMC: 10644169. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282655.

Organic, Earth-Friendly Tobacco With a Charcoal Filter and Smooth Taste: A Randomized Experiment Testing Effects of Natural American Spirit's "Sky" Cigarette Advertising on Consumer Perceptions.

Gratale S, Pearson J, Mercincavage M, Wackowski O Nicotine Tob Res. 2023; 26(2):161-168.

PMID: 37349148 PMC: 10803116. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntad099.

Is perception reality? Associations among "light" cigarettes and number of cigarettes smoked per day.

Freitas-Lemos R, Tegge A, Athamneh L, Yeh Y, Craft W, Stein J Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023; 244:109709.

PMID: 36642000 PMC: 10081565. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109709.

References

Wilkenfeld J, Henningfield J, Slade J, Burns D, Pinney J . It's time for a change: cigarette smokers deserve meaningful information about their cigarettes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(2):90-2. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.2.90. View

Thun M, Burns D . Health impact of "reduced yield" cigarettes: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence. Tob Control. 2001; 10 Suppl 1:i4-11. PMC: 1766045. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i4. View

Kozlowski L, Pillitteri J . Beliefs about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research. Tob Control. 2001; 10 Suppl 1:i12-6. PMC: 1766049. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i12. View

Shiffman S, Pillitteri J, Burton S, Rohay J, Gitchell J . Effect of health messages about "Light" and "Ultra Light" cigarettes on beliefs and quitting intent. Tob Control. 2001; 10 Suppl 1:i24-32. PMC: 1766048. DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.suppl_1.i24. View

Heatherton T, Kozlowski L, Frecker R, Fagerstrom K . The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991; 86(9):1119-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x. View

Biener L, Abrams D . The Contemplation Ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991; 10(5):360-5. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.10.5.360. View

Warner K, Peck C, Woosley R, Henningfield J, Slade J . Treatment of tobacco dependence: innovative regulatory approaches to reduce death and disease: preface. Food Drug Law J. 1999; 53 suppl:1-8. View

Kozlowski L, Goldberg M, Yost B, Ahern F, Aronson K, Sweeney C . Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey. Tob Control. 1996; 5(4):265-70. PMC: 1759525. DOI: 10.1136/tc.5.4.265. View

Hoffmann D, Djordjevic M, Hoffmann I . The changing cigarette. Prev Med. 1997; 26(4):427-34. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0183. View

10.

Thun M, Lally C, Flannery J, Calle E, Flanders W, Heath Jr C . Cigarette smoking and changes in the histopathology of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89(21):1580-6. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/89.21.1580. View

11.

Kozlowski L, Goldberg M, Yost B, White E, Sweeney C, Pillitteri J . Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00004-x. View

12.

Hurt R, ROBERTSON C . Prying open the door to the tobacco industry's secrets about nicotine: the Minnesota Tobacco Trial. JAMA. 1998; 280(13):1173-81. DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.13.1173. View

13.

Davis R . Tobacco Control: reflections on the first seven years. Tob Control. 1999; 8(1):1-9. PMC: 1763922. DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.1.1. View

14.

Warner K, Slade J . Low tar, high toll. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82(1):17-8. PMC: 1694398. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.1.17. View