» Articles » PMID: 20844077

Caffeine Consumption During Pregnancy and Risk of Preterm Birth: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2010 Sep 17
PMID 20844077
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on the risk of preterm delivery has been studied for the past 3 decades with inconsistent results.

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis examining the association between caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth.

Design: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE articles published between 1966 and July 2010, cross-referenced reference lists of the retrieved articles, and identified 15 cohort and 7 case-control studies that met inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis.

Results: The combined odds ratios (ORs) obtained by using fixed-effects models for cohort studies were 1.11 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.28), 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.19), and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.27) for risk of preterm birth comparing the highest with the lowest level of caffeine intake (or no intake) (mg/d) during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Results for the case-control studies yielded no associations for the first (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.37), second (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.45), or third (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.12) trimesters. No overall heterogeneity was found by region, publication decade, exposure and outcome assessment, caffeine sources, or adjustment for confounding, which was largely driven by individual studies.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, we observed no important association between caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth for cohort and case-control studies.

Citing Articles

The Fetal Effect of Maternal Caffeine Consumption During Pregnancy-A Review.

Dube R, Kar S, Bahutair S, Kuruba M, Shafi S, Zaidi H Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002803 PMC: 11852448. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020390.


Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and the risk of delivering a small for gestational age baby: Kuopio Birth Cohort.

Kukkonen A, Hantunen S, Voutilainen A, Ruusunen A, Backman K, Kirjavainen P Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(1):359-368.

PMID: 38767721 PMC: 11169027. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07538-7.


Beverages - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.

Sonestedt E, Lukic M Food Nutr Res. 2024; 68.

PMID: 38571923 PMC: 10989231. DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10458.


Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

Williford E, Yang W, Howley M, Ma C, Collins R, Weber K Birth Defects Res. 2023; 116(1):e2294.

PMID: 38155422 PMC: 11561737. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2294.


Microbiota-indole 3-propionic acid-brain axis mediates abnormal synaptic pruning of hippocampal microglia and susceptibility to ASD in IUGR offspring.

Wang T, Chen B, Luo M, Xie L, Lu M, Lu X Microbiome. 2023; 11(1):245.

PMID: 37932832 PMC: 10629055. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01656-1.


References
1.
Watkinson B, Fried P . Maternal caffeine use before, during and after pregnancy and effects upon offspring. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985; 7(1):9-17. View

2.
Goldstein A, Warren R . Passage of caffeine into human gonadal and fetal tissue. Biochem Pharmacol. 1962; 11:166-8. DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(62)90106-5. View

3.
Schmidt F, Oh I, Hayes T . Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007; 62(Pt 1):97-128. DOI: 10.1348/000711007X255327. View

4.
Sachse C, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, Roots I . Functional significance of a C-->A polymorphism in intron 1 of the cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 gene tested with caffeine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 47(4):445-9. PMC: 2014233. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00898.x. View

5.
Mikkelsen T, Osterdal M, Knudsen V, Haugen M, Meltzer H, Bakketeig L . Association between a Mediterranean-type diet and risk of preterm birth among Danish women: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(3):325-30. DOI: 10.1080/00016340801899347. View