» Articles » PMID: 20687916

Mab-31 and the TGF-beta Pathway Act in the Ray Lineage to Pattern C. Elegans Male Sensory Rays

Overview
Journal BMC Dev Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Aug 7
PMID 20687916
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: C. elegans TGF-beta-like Sma/Mab signaling pathway regulates both body size and sensory ray patterning. Most of the components in this pathway were initially identified by genetic screens based on the small body phenotype, and many of these mutants display sensory ray patterning defect. At the cellular level, little is known about how and where these components work although ray structural cell has been implicated as one of the targets. Based on the specific ray patterning abnormality, we aim to identify by RNAi approach additional components that function specifically in the ray lineage to elucidate the regulatory role of TGF-beta signaling in ray differentiation.

Result: We report here the characterization of a new member of the Sma/Mab pathway, mab-31, recovered from a genome-wide RNAi screen. mab-31 mutants showed ray cell cluster patterning defect and mis-specification of the ray identity. mab-31 encodes a nuclear protein expressed in descendants of ray precursor cells impacting on the ray cell's clustering properties, orientation of cell division plane, and fusion of structural cells. Genetic experiments also establish its relationship with other Sma/Mab pathway components and transcription factors acting upstream and downstream of the signaling event.

Conclusion: mab-31 function is indispensable in Sma/Mab signal recipient cells during sensory rays specification. Both mab-31 and sma-6 are required in ray lineage at the late larval stages. They act upstream of C. elegans Pax-6 homolog and repress its function. These findings suggested mab-31 is a key factor that can integrate TFG-beta signals in male sensory ray lineage to define organ identity.

Citing Articles

TGF-β pathways in aging and immunity: lessons from .

Yamamoto K, Savage-Dunn C Front Genet. 2023; 14:1220068.

PMID: 37732316 PMC: 10507863. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1220068.


From "the Worm" to "the Worms" and Back Again: The Evolutionary Developmental Biology of Nematodes.

Haag E, Fitch D, Delattre M Genetics. 2018; 210(2):397-433.

PMID: 30287515 PMC: 6216592. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300243.


Sexual Dimorphism and Sex Differences in Neuronal Development and Behavior.

Barr M, Garcia L, Portman D Genetics. 2018; 208(3):909-935.

PMID: 29487147 PMC: 5844341. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300294.


SMAD Transcription Factor, Sma-9, Attunes TGF-β Signaling Cascade Towards Modulating Amyloid Beta Aggregation and Associated Outcome in Transgenic C. elegans.

Haque R, Nazir A Mol Neurobiol. 2014; 53(1):109-119.

PMID: 25407930 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-8988-y.


TGF-β signaling in C. elegans.

Gumienny T, Savage-Dunn C WormBook. 2013; :1-34.

PMID: 23908056 PMC: 5081272. DOI: 10.1895/wormbook.1.22.2.

References
1.
Li S, Armstrong C, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, Boxem M . A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science. 2004; 303(5657):540-3. PMC: 1698949. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091403. View

2.
Massague J . How cells read TGF-beta signals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 1(3):169-78. DOI: 10.1038/35043051. View

3.
Savage C, Das P, Finelli A, Townsend S, Sun C, Baird S . Caenorhabditis elegans genes sma-2, sma-3, and sma-4 define a conserved family of transforming growth factor beta pathway components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(2):790-4. PMC: 40134. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.790. View

4.
Yoshida S, Morita K, Mochii M, Ueno N . Hypodermal expression of Caenorhabditis elegans TGF-beta type I receptor SMA-6 is essential for the growth and maintenance of body length. Dev Biol. 2002; 240(1):32-45. DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0443. View

5.
Kamath R, Martinez-Campos M, Zipperlen P, Fraser A, Ahringer J . Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001; 2(1):RESEARCH0002. PMC: 17598. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002. View