» Articles » PMID: 20673256

Impact of Gauze-based NPWT on the Patient and Nursing Experience in the Treatment of Challenging Wounds

Overview
Journal Int Wound J
Date 2010 Aug 3
PMID 20673256
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy is widely used in the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds; however, pain during dressing changes, which is often associated with pain on the commencement and cessation of pressure application and because of in-growth of new granulation tissue into interstices of foam dressings, is often experienced. Anecdotal reports have suggested that choice of gauze as the negative pressure wound therapy dressing may reduce the pain associated with dressing changes. A prospective, multi-center, non-comparative clinical investigation was carried out using gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in chronic and acute wounds. Over 152 patients were evaluated. Median duration of therapy was 18 days with 91% of patients progressing towards healing at the end of therapy. Wound pain and odour were significantly reduced (P < 0.001) over the course of therapy. Wound pain during dressing changes was reported to be absent in 80% of dressing removals. No damage to the wound bed following dressing removal was observed in 96% of dressing changes. Dressing applications were considered easy in 79% of assessments and took a median of 20 min to complete. In patients susceptible to pain, gauze-based negative pressure therapy may be a viable option to maximise patient comfort.

Citing Articles

Analgesic effect of premixed nitrous oxide/oxygen on removal of vacuum assisted closure dressings: randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Xing Y, Hou Y, Li C, Wang W, Fu C, Tang L J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):231.

PMID: 40038774 PMC: 11877702. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05397-1.


The use of gauze-based negative-pressure wound therapy with Y-connector for dressing full-circumference skin grafts on both lower limbs.

Fukui M, Kakudo N, Hihara M, Mitsui T, Matsuoka Y, Kuro A J Surg Case Rep. 2021; 2021(6):rjab266.

PMID: 34211695 PMC: 8241479. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab266.


Full circumference lower extremity degloving injury treated with hydrosurgical debridement and negative-pressure wound therapy with gauze wound filler for fixation of avulsed flap skin grafts.

Nagama T, Kakudo N, Kuro A, Ozaki Y, Shirasawa Y, Kunieda S J Surg Case Rep. 2020; 2020(12):rjaa498.

PMID: 33343870 PMC: 7736998. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa498.


Mechanical effects of negative pressure wound therapy on abdominal wounds - effects of different pressures and wound fillers.

Torbrand C, Anesater E, Borgquist O, Malmsjo M Int Wound J. 2017; 15(1):24-28.

PMID: 29171143 PMC: 7949815. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12810.


Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of Combat Wounds: A Critical Review.

Maurya S, Bhandari P Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2016; 5(9):379-389.

PMID: 27679749 PMC: 5028902. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2014.0624.


References
1.
Loree S, Dompmartin A, Penven K, Harel D, Leroy D . Is Vacuum Assisted Closure a valid technique for debriding chronic leg ulcers?. J Wound Care. 2004; 13(6):249-52. DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.6.26629. View

2.
Jones S, Banwell P, Shakespeare P . Interface dressings influence the delivery of topical negative-pressure therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116(4):1023-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000178399.68254.13. View

3.
Eginton M, Brown K, Seabrook G, Towne J, Cambria R . A prospective randomized evaluation of negative-pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003; 17(6):645-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10016-003-0065-3. View

4.
Blume P, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J . Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2007; 31(4):631-6. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2196. View

5.
Llanos S, Danilla S, Barraza C, Armijo E, Pineros J, Quintas M . Effectiveness of negative pressure closure in the integration of split thickness skin grafts: a randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(5):700-5. PMC: 1856589. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217745.56657.e5. View