» Articles » PMID: 16163089

Interface Dressings Influence the Delivery of Topical Negative-pressure Therapy

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2005 Sep 16
PMID 16163089
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Topical negative-pressure therapy is a widely used wound management system that generates a negative pressure at the wound surface through a foam pad, which aids in wound stimulation through mechanical forces on the wound bed. System guidelines state that the foam dressing should be placed in direct apposition with the wound surface; however, an interface dressing is often inserted at this point to promote comfort at dressing changes.

Methods: Topical negative-pressure dressings were applied to 40 healthy volunteers. Pressures at the skin surface under the dressing were recorded and compared with those measured by a topical negative-pressure machine using the Therapeutic Regulated Accurate Care pad system. These were repeated, inserting different types of interface dressings: petroleum jelly (Vaseline)-impregnated gauze, nonadherent silicone dressing, and mylar polyester film dressing.

Results: Pressures recorded at the skin interface with no interface dressing were close to those set on the topical negative-pressure machine (mean pressure change, -5.11 +/- 0.55 mmHg). Interposition of dressings at the skin/foam interface affected pressure transmission through the foam, and some caused significant decreases in pressures recorded at the skin surface (e.g., Vaseline-impregnated gauze: mean pressure change, -11.76 mmHg; maximum pressure change, -41 mmHg).

Conclusion: The loss in negative pressure means that pressures designated by the machine cannot be relied on as a measure of wound pressure when certain dressings are used at the interface. This could be important in determining the outcome of some wounds under topical negative-pressure therapy treatment.

Citing Articles

Revisiting negative pressure wound therapy from a mechanobiological perspective supported by clinical and pathological data.

Gefen A, Russo S, Ciliberti M Int Wound J. 2024; 21(12):e70098.

PMID: 39694469 PMC: 11655127. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.70098.


Post-CABG Deep Sternal Wound Infection: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Early versus Late Referral to a Plastic Surgery Unit in a Tertiary Care Center.

Sahasrabudhe P, Pradhan M, Panse N, Jagtap R Indian J Plast Surg. 2021; 54(2):157-162.

PMID: 34239237 PMC: 8257308. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731256.


Silicone-coated non-woven polyester dressing enhances reepithelialisation in a sheep model of dermal wounds.

Losi P, Briganti E, Costa M, Sanguinetti E, Soldani G J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012; 23(9):2235-43.

PMID: 22692367 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-012-4701-8.


Major bleeding during negative pressure wound/V.A.C.®--therapy for postsurgical deep sternal wound infection--a critical appraisal.

van Wingerden J, Segers P, Jekel L J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 6:121.

PMID: 21955731 PMC: 3191481. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-121.


Impact of gauze-based NPWT on the patient and nursing experience in the treatment of challenging wounds.

Hurd T, Chadwick P, Cote J, Cockwill J, Mole T, Smith J Int Wound J. 2010; 7(6):448-55.

PMID: 20673256 PMC: 7951597. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00714.x.