Kinetics of Cardiac Muscle Contraction and Relaxation Are Linked and Determined by Properties of the Cardiac Sarcomere
Overview
Physiology
Authors
Affiliations
The regulation of myocardial contraction and relaxation kinetics is currently incompletely understood. When the amplitude of contraction is increased via the Frank-Starling mechanism, the kinetics of the contraction slow down, but when the amplitude of contraction is increased with either an increase in heart rate or via β-adrenergic stimulation, the kinetics speed up. It is also unknown how physiological mechanisms affect the kinetics of contraction versus those of relaxation. We investigated contraction-relaxation coupling in isolated trabeculae from the mouse and rat and stimulated them to contract at various temperatures, frequencies, preloads, and in the absence and presence of β-adrenergic stimulation. In each muscle at least 16 different conditions were assessed, and the correlation coefficient of the speed of contraction and relaxation was very close (generally >0.98). Moreover, in all but one of the analyzed murine strains, the ratio of the minimum rate of the derivative of force development (dF/dt) over maximum dF/dt was not significantly different. Only in trabeculae isolated from myosin-binding protein-C mutant mice was this ratio significantly lower (0.61 ± 0.07 vs. 0.84 ± 0.02 in 11 other strains of mice). Within each strain, this ratio was unaffected by modulation of length, frequency, or β-adrenergic stimulation. Rat trabeculae showed identical results; the balance between kinetics of contraction and relaxation was generally constant (0.85 ± 0.04). Because of the great variety in underlying excitation-contraction coupling in the assessed strains, we concluded that contraction-relation coupling is a property residing in the cardiac sarcomere.
Nabiev S, Kopylova G, Nefedova V, Matyushenko A, Shchepkin D, Bershitsky S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.
PMID: 39769170 PMC: 11677233. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413405.
Kochurova A, Beldiia E, Nefedova V, Yampolskaya D, Koubassova N, Kleymenov S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).
PMID: 39456977 PMC: 11508426. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011195.
Strash N, DeLuca S, Janer Carattini G, Chen Y, Wu T, Helfer A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(4):eadh2598.
PMID: 38266090 PMC: 10807800. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2598.
Kim S, Randall E, Jezek F, Beard D, Chesler N Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1231688.
PMID: 37745253 PMC: 10512181. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1231688.
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome explained using a baroreflex response model.
Geddes J, Ottesen J, Mehlsen J, Olufsen M J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(193):20220220.
PMID: 36000360 PMC: 9399868. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0220.