» Articles » PMID: 20652706

How Greater Mouse-eared Bats Deal with Ambiguous Echoic Scenes

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Jul 24
PMID 20652706
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Echolocating bats have to assign the received echoes to the correct call that generated them. Failing to do so will result in the perception of virtual targets that are positioned where there is no actual target. The assignment of echoes to the emitted calls can be ambiguous especially if the pulse intervals between calls are short and kept constant. Here, we present first evidence that greater mouse-eared bats deal with ambiguity by changing the pulse interval more often, in particular by reducing the number of calls in the terminal group before landing. This strategy separates virtual targets from real ones according to their change in position. Real targets will always remain in a constant position, and virtual targets will jitter back and forth according to the change in the time interval.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal patterning of acoustic gaze in echolocating bats navigating gaps in clutter.

Tuninetti A, Ming C, Hom K, Simmons J, Simmons A iScience. 2021; 24(4):102353.

PMID: 33870143 PMC: 8047172. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102353.


How frequency hopping suppresses pulse-echo ambiguity in bat biosonar.

Ming C, Bates M, Simmons J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(29):17288-17295.

PMID: 32632013 PMC: 7382275. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001105117.


Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) reveal diverse strategies for sonar target tracking in clutter.

Mao B, Aytekin M, Wilkinson G, Moss C J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 140(3):1839.

PMID: 27914429 PMC: 6909987. DOI: 10.1121/1.4962496.


Echolocating Big Brown Bats, Eptesicus fuscus, Modulate Pulse Intervals to Overcome Range Ambiguity in Cluttered Surroundings.

Wheeler A, Fulton K, Gaudette J, Simmons R, Matsuo I, Simmons J Front Behav Neurosci. 2016; 10:125.

PMID: 27445723 PMC: 4916216. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00125.


It's not black or white-on the range of vision and echolocation in echolocating bats.

Boonman A, Bar-On Y, Cvikel N, Yovel Y Front Physiol. 2013; 4:248.

PMID: 24065924 PMC: 3769648. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00248.


References
1.
Wong J, Waters D . The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus). J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 3):575-83. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.3.575. View

2.
Melcon M, Schnitzler H, Denzinger A . Variability of the approach phase of landing echolocating Greater Mouse-eared bats. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2008; 195(1):69-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0383-6. View

3.
Boonman A, Jones G . Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensori-motor behaviour in Daubenton's bats, Myotis daubentonii. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 18):2865-74. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.18.2865. View

4.
Moss C, Surlykke A . Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 110(4):2207-26. DOI: 10.1121/1.1398051. View

5.
Holderied M, Korine C, Fenton M, Parsons S, Robson S, Jones G . Echolocation call intensity in the aerial hawking bat Eptesicus bottae (Vespertilionidae) studied using stereo videogrammetry. J Exp Biol. 2005; 208(Pt 7):1321-7. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01528. View