» Articles » PMID: 19322570

Interpulse Interval Modulation by Echolocating Big Brown Bats (Eptesicus Fuscus) in Different Densities of Obstacle Clutter

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 Mar 27
PMID 19322570
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) use biosonar to find insect prey in open areas, but they also find prey near vegetation and even fly through vegetation when in transit from roosts to feeding sites. To evaluate their reactions to dense, distributed clutter, bats were tested in an obstacle array consisting of rows of vertically hanging chains. Chains were removed from the array to create a curved corridor of three clutter densities (high, medium, low). Bats flew along this path to receive a food reward after landing on the far wall. Interpulse intervals (IPIs) varied across clutter densities to reflect different compromises between using short IPIs for gathering echoes rapidly enough to maneuver past the nearest chains and using longer IPIs so that all echoes from one sound can be received before the next sound is emitted. In high-clutter density, IPIs were uniformly shorter (20-65 ms) than in medium and low densities (40-100 ms) and arranged in "strobe groups," with some overlap of echo streams from different broadcasts, causing pulse-echo ambiguity. As previously proposed, alternating short and long IPIs in strobe groups may allow bats to focus on large-scale pathfinding tasks as well as close-in obstacle avoidance.

Citing Articles

Rapid sensorimotor adaptation to auditory midbrain silencing in free-flying bats.

Diebold C, Lawlor J, Allen K, Capshaw G, Humphrey M, Cintron-De Leon D Curr Biol. 2024; 34(23):5507-5517.e3.

PMID: 39549701 PMC: 11614681. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.045.


Daubenton's bats maintain stereotypical echolocation behaviour and a lombard response during target interception in light.

Uebel A, Pedersen M, Beedholm K, Stidsholt L, Skalshoi M, Foskolos I BMC Zool. 2024; 9(1):9.

PMID: 38679717 PMC: 11057132. DOI: 10.1186/s40850-024-00200-4.


Echolocating Bats Have Evolved Decreased Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Temporary Hearing Losses.

Simmons A, Simmons J J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(3):229-238.

PMID: 38565735 PMC: 11150213. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00941-6.


Spatial attention in natural tasks [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations].

Wohlgemuth M, Salles A, Moss C Mol Psychol. 2023; 1.

PMID: 37325441 PMC: 10269881. DOI: 10.12688/molpsychol.17488.1.


Adaptive echolocation behavior of bats and toothed whales in dynamic soundscapes.

Moss C, Torres Ortiz S, Wahlberg M J Exp Biol. 2023; 226(9).

PMID: 37161774 PMC: 10184770. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245450.


References
1.
Wong J, Waters D . The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus). J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 3):575-83. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.3.575. View

2.
Hiryu S, Katsura K, Lin L, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y . Doppler-shift compensation in the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) recorded with a telemetry microphone system during flight. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 118(6):3927-33. DOI: 10.1121/1.2130940. View

3.
Moss C, Surlykke A . Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 110(4):2207-26. DOI: 10.1121/1.1398051. View

4.
Surlykke A, Moss C . Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108(5 Pt 1):2419-29. DOI: 10.1121/1.1315295. View

5.
Muller R, Kuc R . Foliage echoes: a probe into the ecological acoustics of bat echolocation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 108(2):836-45. DOI: 10.1121/1.429617. View