» Articles » PMID: 3625576

The Echolocation and Hunting Behavior of the Bat, Pipistrellus Kuhli

Overview
Date 1987 Aug 1
PMID 3625576
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The echolocation and hunting behavior of Pipistrellus kuhli was studied in the field using multi-exposure photography synchronized with high-speed tape recordings. During the search phase, the bats used 8-12 ms signals with sweeps (sweep width 3-6 kHz) and pulse intervals near 100 ms or less often near 200 ms. The bats seemed to have individual terminal frequencies that could lie between 35 and 40 kHz. The duty cycle of searching signals was about 8%. The flight speed of hunting bats was between 4.0 and 4.5 m/s. The bats reacted to insect prey at distances of about 70 to 120 cm. Given the flight speed, the detection distance was estimated to about 110 to 160 cm. Following detection the bat went into the approach phase where the FM sweep steepened (to about 60 kHz bandwidth) and the repetition rate increased (to about 30 Hz). The terminal phase or 'buzz', which indicates prey capture (or attempted capture), was composed of two sections. The first section contained signals similar to those in the approach phase except that the pulse duration decreased and the repetition rate increased. The second section was characterized by a sharp drop in the terminal frequency (to about 20 kHz) and by very short pulses (0.3 ms) at rates of up to 200 Hz. Near the beginning of the buzz the bat prepared for capturing the prey by extending the wings and forming a tail pouch. A pause of about 100 ms in sound emission after the buzz indicated a successful capture (Fig. 4).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

What determines the information update rate in echolocating bats.

Taub M, Goldshtein A, Boonman A, Eitan O, Hurme E, Greif S Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1187.

PMID: 37989853 PMC: 10663583. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05563-x.


Pregnancy-related sensory deficits might impair foraging in echolocating bats.

Taub M, Mazar O, Yovel Y BMC Biol. 2023; 21(1):60.

PMID: 36973777 PMC: 10044376. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01557-7.


Neural Processing of Naturalistic Echolocation Signals in Bats.

Beetz M, Hechavarria J Front Neural Circuits. 2022; 16:899370.

PMID: 35664459 PMC: 9157489. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.899370.


Reciprocal processes of sensory perception and social bonding: an integrated social-sensory framework of social behavior.

Prior N, Bentz E, Ophir A Genes Brain Behav. 2021; 21(3):e12781.

PMID: 34905293 PMC: 9744507. DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12781.


An ecological approach to measuring synchronization abilities across the animal kingdom.

Henry M, Cook P, de Reus K, Nityananda V, Rouse A, Kotz S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1835):20200336.

PMID: 34420382 PMC: 8380968. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0336.


References
1.
CAHLANDER D, McCue J, WEBSTER F . THE DETERMINATION OF DISTANCE BY ECHOLOCATING BATS. Nature. 1964; 201:544-6. DOI: 10.1038/201544a0. View

2.
Simmons J, Fenton M, OFarrell M . Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science. 1979; 203(4375):16-21. DOI: 10.1126/science.758674. View