» Articles » PMID: 20559831

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: Five to Eight Year Results

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 Jun 19
PMID 20559831
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hip resurfacings have been performed in our hospital since May 2001, and in this retrospective study, we analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of the first 144 prostheses (126 patients). One hundred and seven patients have visited our hospital for regular follow-up examination; 16 are not in regular follow-up and were sent a Harris Hip Score (HHS) questionnaire. Three patients live abroad. Mean follow-up was six years. One patient was lost during follow-up. Four prostheses have been revised. The six year cumulative survival rate was 96.7%. Two female patients required revision for aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vascular associated lesions (ALVAL) and two male patients due for femoral head necrosis. Both reoperated female patients had cup inclination > 60°. Mean HHS in the follow-up was 95.3, and mean patient satisfaction 2.53 on a scale 0-3. Neck thinning > 10% was seen in seven hips and impingement in 12 hips.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.

Reito A, Lainiala O, Elo P, Eskelinen A PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0147872.

PMID: 26930057 PMC: 4773181. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147872.


Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.

Pailhe R, Matharu G, Sharma A, Pynsent P, Treacy R Int Orthop. 2013; 38(6):1139-45.

PMID: 24370976 PMC: 4037503. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2240-7.


Correlation between groin pain and cup design of hip-resurfacing implants: a prospective study.

Girard J, Pansard E, Ouahes R, Migaud H, Delay C, Vasseur L Int Orthop. 2013; 38(5):923-8.

PMID: 24323353 PMC: 3997767. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2226-5.


[Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Klotz M, Breusch S, Hassenpflug M, Bitsch R Orthopade. 2012; 41(6):442-51.

PMID: 22622658 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1899-6.


Outcomes of birmingham hip resurfacing: a systematic review.

Karas S Asian J Sports Med. 2012; 3(1):1-7.

PMID: 22461959 PMC: 3307960. DOI: 10.5812/asjsm.34717.


References
1.
Hing C, Young D, Dalziel R, Bailey M, Back D, Shimmin A . Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(8):1019-24. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18830. View

2.
Beaule P, Shim P, Banga K . Clinical experience of Ganz surgical dislocation approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6 Suppl):127-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.006. View

3.
DeLee J, CHARNLEY J . Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; (121):20-32. View

4.
Beaule P, Campbell P, Lu Z, Leunig-Ganz K, Beck M, Leunig M . Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88 Suppl 4:85-96. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00592. View

5.
Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P . Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76(1):28-41. DOI: 10.1080/00016470510030292. View