Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Asian J Sports Med

Publisher Brieflands

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2012 Mar 31

PMID 22461959

Authors

Steve Karas

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a systematic review to assess the functional outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing as reported in peer-reviewed literature.

Methods: We performed a computerized search on the data sources up to February 2011. The following text and key words were searched: "Birmingham hip", "Birmingham hip resurfacing" and "Hip resurfacing". Each of these key words was again searched with "outcomes" following them. We also hand searched the bibliographies of the retrieved articles and our own files to identify specifically relevant articles.

Results: Fourteen retrospective studies and three prospective studies were included for review. Each of these studies was evaluated by the criteria given by Sackett and AACPDM. The design, patient criteria, intervention, outcomes, duration of follow up and results of the research were reported.

Conclusions: Although the technique of BHR does allow the femur to be spared, claims that it may allow patients to be more active need to be further investigated.

References

Banerjee M, Bouillon B, Banerjee C, Bathis H, Lefering R, Nardini M . Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(6):1229-36. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509357609. View

Reito A, Puolakka T, Pajamaki J . Birmingham hip resurfacing: five to eight year results. Int Orthop. 2010; 35(8):1119-24. PMC: 3167436. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1066-9. View

Murphy T, Trousdale R, Pagnano M, Mabry T, Sierra R . Patients' perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2009; 32(10). DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090818-10. View

Hing C, Back D, Bailey M, Young D, Dalziel R, Shimmin A . The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(11):1431-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19336. View

Back D, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A . Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(3):324-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15556. View

McCarthy J, Noble P, Schuck M, Wright J, Lee J . The Otto E. Aufranc Award: The role of labral lesions to development of early degenerative hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (393):25-37. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00004. View

Steffen R, Pandit H, Palan J, Beard D, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P . The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(4):436-41. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648. View

Pollard T, Baker R, Eastaugh-Waring S, Bannister G . Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(5):592-600. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354. View

Treacy R, McBryde C, Pynsent P . Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(2):167-70. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15030. View

10.

De Smet K, Pattyn C, Verdonck R . Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int. 2017; 12(2):158-162. DOI: 10.1177/112070000201200225. View

11.

Tennent T, Goddard N . Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000; 82(1):33-8. PMC: 2503446. View

12.

Madhu T, Akula M, Raman R, Sharma H, Johnson V . The Birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis: an independent single surgeon's experience at 7-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 26(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.10.010. View

13.

Narvani A, Tsiridis E, Nwaboku H, Bajekal R . Sporting activity following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Int J Sports Med. 2006; 27(6):505-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924199. View

14.

Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai E . Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic primary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(3):623-37. PMC: 2635466. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0625-5. View

15.

Khan M, Kuiper J, Edwards D, Robinson E, Richardson J . Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(7):1044-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.016. View

16.

Treacy R, McBryde C, Shears E, Pynsent P . Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(1):27-33. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24134. View

17.

Bose V, Baruah B . Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a minimum follow-up of four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(7):922-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B7.23639. View

18.

Martin R, Enseki K, Draovitch P, Trapuzzano T, Philippon M . Acetabular labral tears of the hip: examination and diagnostic challenges. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(7):503-15. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2135. View

19.

Malek I, Hashmi M, Holland J . Socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years. Int Orthop. 2010; 35(10):1467-70. PMC: 3174309. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1168-4. View

20.

Larbpaiboonpong V, Turajane T, Pragtong P . The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010; 92 Suppl 6:S134-40. View