» Articles » PMID: 19794161

Blood Metal Ion Concentrations After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: a Comparative Study of Articular Surface Replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasties

Overview
Date 2009 Oct 2
PMID 19794161
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There have been no large comparative studies of the blood levels of metal ions after implantation of commercially available hip resurfacing devices which have taken into account the effects of femoral size and inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component. We present the results in 90 patients with unilateral articular surface replacement (ASR) hip resurfacings (mean time to blood sampling 26 months) and 70 patients with unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implants (mean time 47 months). The whole blood and serum chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) concentrations were inversely related to the size of the femoral component in both groups (p < 0.05). Cr and Co were more strongly influenced by the position of the acetabular component in the case of the ASR, with an increase in metal ions observed at inclinations > 45 degrees and anteversion angles of < 10 degrees and > 20 degrees. These levels were only increased in the BHR group when the acetabular component was implanted with an inclination > 55 degrees. A significant relationship was identified between the anteversion of the BHR acetabular component and the levels of Cr and Co (p < 0.05 for Co), with an increase observed at anteversion angles < 10 degrees and > 20 degrees. The median whole blood and serum Cr concentrations of the male ASR patients were significantly lower than those of the BHR men (p < 0.001). This indicates that reduced diametral clearance may equate to a reduction in metal ion concentrations in larger joints with satisfactory orientation of the acetabular component.

Citing Articles

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: is it safe and reliable? A synopsis of the past, the present, and the future of HRA.

Xie F, Sheng S, Palan J, Pandit H EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(8):751-761.

PMID: 39087509 PMC: 11370715. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0099.


Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach.

Regis D, Lugani G, Valentini A, Sandri A, Ambrosini C, Bagnis F Musculoskelet Surg. 2023; 107(4):439-446.

PMID: 37285004 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00789-8.


Careful patient selection together with optimal implant positioning may reduce but does not eliminate the risk of elevated serum cobalt and chrome levels following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Oxblom A, Hedlund H, Itayem R, Fellander-Tsai L, Vidgren M, Rolfson O Hip Int. 2022; 33(5):872-879.

PMID: 36314413 PMC: 10486161. DOI: 10.1177/11207000221124302.


Predictive factors affecting long-term survivorship of ASR metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Agarwala S, Vijayvargiya M SICOT J. 2021; 7:51.

PMID: 34668856 PMC: 8527991. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021040.


The in vivo location of edge-wear in hip arthroplasties : combining pre-revision 3D CT imaging with retrieval analysis.

Bergiers S, Hothi H, Henckel J, Di Laura A, Belzunce M, Skinner J Bone Joint Res. 2021; 10(10):639-649.

PMID: 34605661 PMC: 8559968. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1010.BJR-2021-0132.R1.