» Articles » PMID: 20556604

Ultrafast Assessment of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony from Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging on a New High-speed Gamma Camera

Overview
Date 2010 Jun 18
PMID 20556604
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To validate the ultrafast assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony by phase analysis using high-speed nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) on a new gamma camera with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) solid-state detector technology.

Methods: In 46 patients rest MPI with 960 MBq (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin was acquired on a dual-head detector SPECT camera (Ventri, GE Healthcare) and an ultrafast CZT camera (Discovery NM 530c, GE Healthcare) with acquisition times of 15 and 5 min, respectively. LV dyssynchrony was assessed using the Emory Cardiac Toolbox with established values for histogram bandwidth (male <62.4°; female <49.7°) and standard deviations (male <24.4°; female <22.1°) as the gold standard. Evaluating CZT scan times of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 5 min (list mode) in 16 patients revealed the preferred scan time to be 5 min, which was then applied in all 46 patients. Intraclass correlation and the level of agreement in dyssynchrony detection between the CZT and Ventri cameras were assessed.

Results: In LV dyssynchrony the mean histogram bandwidths with the CZT camera (n = 8) and the Ventri camera (n = 9) were 123.3 ± 50.6° and 130.2 ± 43.2° (p not significant) and 42.4 ± 13.6° vs. 43.2 ± 12.7° (p not significant). Normal bandwidths and SD obtained with the CZT camera (35.9 ± 7.7°, 12.6 ± 3.5°) and the Ventri camera (34.8 ± 6.6°, 11.1 ± 2.1°, both p not significant) excluded dyssynchrony in 38 and 37 patients, respectively. Intraclass correlation and the level of agreement between the CZT camera with a 5-min scan time and the Ventri camera were 0.94 (p < 0.001, SEE 14.4) and 96% for histogram bandwidth and 0.96 (p < 0.001, SEE 3.9) and 98% for SD.

Conclusion: This ultrafast CZT camera allows accurate assessment of LV dyssynchrony with a scan time of only 5 min, facilitating repeat measurements which would potentially be helpful for parameter optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Citing Articles

Relationship between left ventricular mechanical synchrony and left ventricular systolic function: a CZT-SPECT analysis.

Sun Q, Huang R, Fu S, Wu C, Guo X, Li T BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):420.

PMID: 36138379 PMC: 9494855. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02863-8.


The value of cardiac sympathetic activity and mechanical dyssynchrony as cardiac resynchronization therapy response predictors: comparison between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure.

Mishkina A, Saushkin V, Atabekov T, Sazonova S, Shipulin V, Massalha S J Nucl Cardiol. 2022; 30(1):371-382.

PMID: 35834158 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-022-03046-w.


A Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony-Based Nomogram for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events Risk in Patients With Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Zhang H, Shi K, Fei M, Fan X, Liu L, Xu C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:827231.

PMID: 35369339 PMC: 8971375. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.827231.


Phase analysis single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) detects dyssynchrony in myocardial scar and increases specificity of MPI.

Bois J, Scott C, Chareonthaitawee P, Gibbons R, Rodriguez-Porcel M EJNMMI Res. 2019; 9(1):11.

PMID: 30706258 PMC: 6355889. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0476-y.


Value of intraventricular dyssynchrony assessment by gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in the management of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (VISION-CRT).

Peix A, Karthikeyan G, Massardo T, Kalaivani M, Patel C, Pabon L J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 28(1):55-64.

PMID: 30684258 PMC: 7921049. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01589-5.


References
1.
Bax J, Abraham T, Barold S, Breithardt O, Fung J, Garrigue S . Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 1--issues before device implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(12):2153-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.019. View

2.
Suffoletto M, Dohi K, Cannesson M, Saba S, Gorcsan 3rd J . Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006; 113(7):960-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.571455. View

3.
Henneman M, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker G, Boersma E . Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(16):1708-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.063. View

4.
Trimble M, Velazquez E, Adams G, Honeycutt E, Pagnanelli R, Barnhart H . Repeatability and reproducibility of phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging used to quantify cardiac dyssynchrony. Nucl Med Commun. 2008; 29(4):374-81. PMC: 3048057. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f81380. View

5.
Linde C, Abraham W, Gold M, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Daubert C . Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(23):1834-1843. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.027. View