» Articles » PMID: 18317303

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Phase Analysis of Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Used to Quantify Cardiac Dyssynchrony

Overview
Journal Nucl Med Commun
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2008 Mar 5
PMID 18317303
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A novel method to quantify dyssynchrony has been developed using phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging. We report on the effect of variability in image reconstruction on the phase analysis results (repeatability) and on the interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of the technique.

Methods: Phase standard deviation (SD) and bandwidth are phase indices that quantify dyssynchrony. To evaluate repeatability, raw data sets were processed twice in 50 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and 50 normal controls. To determine the optimal processing method, two replicated phase analysis results were obtained using automated and manual base parameter placement. Reproducibility of the phase analysis was determined using the data from 20 patients.

Results: In normal controls, manual base parameter placement improves repeatability of the phase analysis as measured by the mean absolute difference between two reads for phase SD (12.0 degrees vs. 1.2 degrees , P<0.0001) and bandwidth (33.7 degrees vs. 3.6 degrees , P<0.0001). Repeatability is better for normal controls than for patients with left ventricular dysfunction for phase SD (1.2 degrees vs. 6.0 degrees , P<0.0001) and bandwidth (3.6 degrees vs. 26.5 degrees , P<0.0001). Reproducibility of the phase analysis is high as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficients for phase SD and bandwidth of 0.99 and 0.99 for the interobserver comparisons and 1.00 and 1.00 for the intraobserver comparisons.

Conclusion: A novel method to quantify dyssynchrony has been developed using gated single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging. Manual base parameter placement reduces the effect that variability in image reconstruction has on phase analysis. A high degree of reproducibility of phase analysis is observed.

Citing Articles

Assessing the diagnostic value of left ventricular synchrony indices derived from phase analysis by D-SPECT in identifying obstructive coronary artery disease.

Ding X, Cui L, Li J, Cao J, Ding M, Wang H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 40(9):1919-1930.

PMID: 38960945 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03182-z.


Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony indices derived from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee K, Han S, Ryu J, Cho S, Moon D Ann Nucl Med. 2024; 38(6):441-449.

PMID: 38498236 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01915-7.


Pressure overload is associated with right ventricular dyssynchrony in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Monzo L, Tupy M, Borlaug B, Reichenbach A, Jurcova I, Benes J ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(2):1097-1109.

PMID: 38263857 PMC: 10966231. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14682.


Left ventricular mechanical dyssnchrony: A potential new marker for 3-vessel CAD.

Jalkh K, AlJaroudi W J Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 30(3):1230-1234.

PMID: 36864242 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03232-4.


Left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony: a novel imaging marker for early assessment of myocardial damage in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction and normal myocardial perfusion.

Wang Y, Yu W, Yang X, Zhang F, Sun Y, Hu Y J Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 30(5):1797-1809.

PMID: 36855008 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-023-03215-5.


References
1.
Popovic Z, Grimm R, Perlic G, Chinchoy E, Geraci M, Sun J . Noninvasive assessment of cardiac resynchronization therapy for congestive heart failure using myocardial strain and left ventricular peak power as parameters of myocardial synchrony and function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 13(12):1203-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01203.x. View

2.
Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Pedersen A, Kim W, Kristensen B, Hansen P . Sequential versus simultaneous biventricular resynchronization for severe heart failure: evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation. 2002; 106(16):2078-84. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000034512.90874.8e. View

3.
Henneman M, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel M, Bleeker G, Ypenburg C . Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT?. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(7):1104-11. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.039925. View

4.
Bax J, Bleeker G, Marwick T, Molhoek S, Boersma E, Steendijk P . Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(9):1834-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016. View

5.
Yu C, Zhang Q, Fung J, Chan H, Chan Y, Yip G . A novel tool to assess systolic asynchrony and identify responders of cardiac resynchronization therapy by tissue synchronization imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45(5):677-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.003. View