» Articles » PMID: 20462312

Rod and Cone Contrast Gains Derived from Reaction Time Distribution Modeling

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2010 May 14
PMID 20462312
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contrast gain reflects the rapidity of response amplitude increase with increase in stimulus contrast. In physiology, contrast gain can be measured directly as the initial slope of cell contrast response function. In psychophysics, contrast gain estimation is not straightforward. Further, rod and cone contrast gains have not been measured psychophysically at mesopic light levels where both rods and cones are active, due to the difficulty in producing stimuli that excite rods and cones separately at the same adaptation level. Here, we estimated rod and contrast gains by fitting reaction time distributions measured at a light level in which rods alone (scotopic), rods and cones (mesopic), or cones alone (photopic) mediate vision. The reaction time distributions were modeled by two different strategies, a simplified diffusion model that assumes a stochastic accumulation process and a model we developed that begins with sensory input based on early visual processing impulse response functions and assumes the reaction time variability originates in the response criterion. Estimates of contrast gain from both models were comparable and consistent with primate physiology measurements.

Citing Articles

The role of melanopsin photoreception on visual attention linked pupil responses.

Gnyawali S, Feigl B, Adhikari P, Zele A Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 55(8):1986-2002.

PMID: 35357050 PMC: 9324975. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15659.


Influence of background size, luminance and eccentricity on different adaptation mechanisms.

Gloriani A, Matesanz B, Barrionuevo P, Arranz I, Issolio L, Mar S Vision Res. 2016; 125:12-22.

PMID: 27210038 PMC: 4955780. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.008.


Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Zele A, Cao D Front Psychol. 2015; 5:1594.

PMID: 25657632 PMC: 4302711. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01594.


Effect of rod-cone interactions on mesopic visual performance mediated by chromatic and luminance pathways.

Zele A, Maynard M, Joyce D, Cao D J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014; 31(4):A7-A14.

PMID: 24695205 PMC: 3979541. DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.0000A7.


Functional loss in the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with optic neuritis.

Cao D, Zele A, Pokorny J, Lee D, Messner L, Diehl C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(12):8900-7.

PMID: 22016061 PMC: 3231790. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7644.


References
1.
Swanson W, Wilson H, Giese S . Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds. Vision Res. 1984; 24(1):63-75. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90145-7. View

2.
Ludwig C, Gilchrist I, McSorley E, Baddeley R . The temporal impulse response underlying saccadic decisions. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(43):9907-12. PMC: 6725572. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2197-05.2005. View

3.
Sun H, Ruttiger L, Lee B . The spatiotemporal precision of ganglion cell signals: a comparison of physiological and psychophysical performance with moving gratings. Vision Res. 2003; 44(1):19-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.017. View

4.
Smith P, Ratcliff R, Wolfgang B . Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vision Res. 2004; 44(12):1297-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.002. View

5.
Sun H, Dul M, Swanson W . Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83(7):455-65. PMC: 1752204. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000225103.18087.5d. View