» Articles » PMID: 17346763

Linking Impulse Response Functions to Reaction Time: Rod and Cone Reaction Time Data and a Computational Model

Overview
Journal Vision Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2007 Mar 10
PMID 17346763
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reaction times for incremental and decremental stimuli were measured at five suprathreshold contrasts for six retinal illuminance levels where rods alone (0.002-0.2 Trolands), rods and cones (2-20 Trolands) or cones alone (200 Trolands) mediated detection. A 4-primary photostimulator allowed independent control of rod or cone excitations. This is the first report of reaction times to isolated rod or cone stimuli at mesopic light levels under the same adaptation conditions. The main findings are: (1) For rods, responses to decrements were faster than increments, but cone reaction times were closely similar. (2) At light levels where both systems were functional, rod reaction times were approximately 20 ms longer. The data were fitted with a computational model that incorporates rod and cone impulse response functions and a stimulus-dependent neural sensory component that triggers a motor response. Rod and cone impulse response functions were derived from published psychophysical two-pulse threshold data and temporal modulation transfer functions. The model fits were accomplished with a limited number of free parameters: two global parameters to estimate the irreducible minimum reaction time for each receptor type, and one local parameter for each reaction time versus contrast function. This is the first model to provide a neural basis for the variation in reaction time with retinal illuminance, stimulus contrast, stimulus polarity, and receptor class modulated.

Citing Articles

Biophysical neural adaptation mechanisms enable artificial neural networks to capture dynamic retinal computation.

Idrees S, Manookin M, Rieke F, Field G, Zylberberg J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5957.

PMID: 39009568 PMC: 11251147. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50114-5.


Melanopsin photoreception differentially modulates rod-mediated and cone-mediated human temporal vision.

Uprety S, Adhikari P, Feigl B, Zele A iScience. 2022; 25(7):104529.

PMID: 35754721 PMC: 9218364. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104529.


The role of melanopsin photoreception on visual attention linked pupil responses.

Gnyawali S, Feigl B, Adhikari P, Zele A Eur J Neurosci. 2022; 55(8):1986-2002.

PMID: 35357050 PMC: 9324975. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15659.


Effect of central and peripheral cone- and rod-specific stimulation on the pupillary light reflex.

Sonntag A, Kelbsch C, Jung R, Wilhelm H, Strasser T, Peters T Int Ophthalmol. 2021; 42(5):1427-1436.

PMID: 34826023 PMC: 9123028. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02132-1.


Intermittent Light Exposures in Humans: A Case for Dual Entrainment in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.

Figueiro M, Leggett S Front Neurol. 2021; 12:625698.

PMID: 33767659 PMC: 7985540. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.625698.


References
1.
Stork D, Falk D . Temporal impulse responses from flicker sensitivities. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987; 4(6):1130-5. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.001130. View

2.
HERRICK R . Increment thresholds for two identical flashes. J Opt Soc Am. 1972; 62(1):104-10. DOI: 10.1364/josa.62.000104. View

3.
Uzzell V, Chichilnisky E . Precision of spike trains in primate retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(2):780-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01171.2003. View

4.
CONNER J . The temporal properties of rod vision. J Physiol. 1982; 332:139-55. PMC: 1197391. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014406. View

5.
Smith Jr R . Luminance-dependent changes in mesopic visual contrast sensitivity. J Physiol. 1973; 230(1):115-35. PMC: 1350389. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010178. View