» Articles » PMID: 20450362

Classification of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession

Overview
Journal J Periodontol
Date 2010 May 11
PMID 20450362
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A clinical classification of surface defects in gingival recession area is proposed.

Methods: Two factors were evaluated to set up a classification system: presence (A) or absence (B) of cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and presence (+) or absence (-) of dental surface discrepancy caused by abrasion (step). Four classes (A+, A-, B+, and B-) were identified on the basis of these variables. To validate the classification three different calibrated examiners applied the proposed classification system to 46 gingival recessions and kappa statistics were performed. The classification was used on 1,010 gingival recessions from 353 patients to examine the distribution of the four classes.

Results: The kappa statistics for intrarater agreement ranged from 0.74 to 0.95 (almost perfect agreement), whereas interrater agreement ranged from 0.26 to 0.59 (moderate agreement). Out of 1,010 exposed root surfaces associated with gingival recession, 144 showed an identifiable CEJ associated with a root surface defect (Class A+, 14%); 469 an identifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class A-, 46%); 244 an unidentifiable CEJ with a step (Class B+, 24%); and 153 an unidentifiable CEJ without any associated step (Class B-, 15%).

Conclusion: The proposed classification describes the dental surface defects that are of paramount importance in diagnosing gingival recession areas.

Citing Articles

The effects of vestibular vertical incisions on the tunnel technique: a randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Recession Type 1 single gingival recessions.

Chen Z, Fan K, Xie Y, Zhou S, Zhong J, Ouyang X BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):278.

PMID: 39984958 PMC: 11846288. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05611-4.


Difficulty score for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with the Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel technique: a preliminary reliability study.

Gorski B, Skurska A, Roguljic M, Gelemanovic A, Stefanini M Clin Oral Investig. 2025; 29(1):91.

PMID: 39862381 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-025-06167-x.


Ultrasound identification of the cementoenamel junction and clinical correlation through ex vivo analysis.

Qi B, Fu L, Abdelrehim T, Chang J, Chang H, Chen C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27821.

PMID: 39537843 PMC: 11561095. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79081-z.


Digital workflow to assess gingival recession coverage independently of the cemento-enamel Junction: a prospective clinical study using the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with porcine dermal matrix.

Iglhaut G, Fretwurst T, Schulte L, Sculean A, Vach K, Nelson K Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(11):613.

PMID: 39463191 PMC: 11513702. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05936-4.


Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession with an Enamel Matrix Protein-Coated Xenogeneic Dermal Matrix: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rieder M, Wimmer G, Sokolowski A, Sokolowski A, Payer M, Arefnia B Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203163 PMC: 11355834. DOI: 10.3390/ma17163985.