The Effects of Vestibular Vertical Incisions on the Tunnel Technique: a Randomized Clinical Trial for the Treatment of Recession Type 1 Single Gingival Recessions

Overview

Journal BMC Oral Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2025 Feb 21

PMID 39984958

Authors

Ziyuan Chen

Keang Fan

Ying Xie

Shuangying Zhou

Jinsheng Zhong

Xiangying Ouyang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique and the modified tunnel (mTunnel) technique, both combined with connective tissue grafts (CTGs), for treating recession type 1 (RT1) single gingival recessions.

Methods: A total of 24 patients with single non-molar RT1 recessions were randomly assigned to the VISTA + CTG or the mTunnel + CTG group. A blinded examiner assessed the recession reduction (RecRed), mean root coverage (MRC), complete root coverage (CRC), keratinized tissue width, patient-reported outcomes, and root coverage esthetic score (RES).

Results: At 12 months, both groups achieved significant recession reduction. However, there were no significant differences in RecRed and MRC between the groups (VISTA: 2.38 ± 0.96 mm and 90.28 ± 18.06%, mTunnel: 2.08 ± 1.10 mm and 81.25 ± 29.16%; P = 1 and P = 0.834, respectively). The CRC was significantly higher in the VISTA group (VISTA: 75%, mTunnel: 50%; P < 0.001). Both groups obtained high RES scores (VISTA: 8.75 ± 1.14, mTunnel: 7.75 ± 2.99, P = 0.786), but the mTunnel group demonstrated significantly less scar formation (P = 0.014).

Conclusions: Both procedures effectively treated single RT1 recessions at 12-months follow-up. However, the VISTA technique demonstrated superior CRC results compared to the modified tunnel technique.

Trial Registration: The trial had been registered prospectively at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 19/12/2015 (Registration number: ChiCTR-INR-16007845), and structured according to the CONSORT statement.

References

Chambrone L, Tatakis D . Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015; 86(2 Suppl):S8-51. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674. View

Cairo F, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Barbato L, Wang H, Rasperini G . Aesthetic-And patient-related outcomes following root coverage procedures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47(11):1403-1415. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13346. View

Neves F, Silveira C, Mathias-Santamaria I, Miguel M, Fernanda Ferreira Ferraz L, Casarin R . Randomized clinical trial evaluating single maxillary gingival recession treatment with connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap: 2-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2019; 91(8):1018-1026. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0436. View

Pini Prato G, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Chambrone L . Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects. J Periodontol. 2018; 89(11):1290-1299. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0619. View

Santamaria M, Mathias-Santamaria I, Fernanda Ferreira Ferraz L, Casarin R, Romito G, Sallum E . Rethinking the decision-making process to treat gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions. Braz Oral Res. 2021; 35(Supp 2):e096. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0096. View

Zucchelli G, Mele M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M . Coronally advanced flap with and without vertical releasing incisions for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(7):1083-94. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090041. View

. Consensus report. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996; 1(1):702-6. DOI: 10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.702. View

Santamaria M, Neves F, Silveira C, Mathias I, Fernandes-Dias S, Jardini M . Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44(5):540-547. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12714. View

Lenox J, Kopczyk R . A clinical system for scoring a patient's oral hygiene performance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973; 86(4):849-52. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0178. View

10.

Nieri M, Rotundo R, Franceschi D, Cairo F, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G . Factors affecting the outcome of the coronally advanced flap procedure: a Bayesian network analysis. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(3):405-10. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080146. View

11.

Skierska I, Gorski B, Fus L . Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross-linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: 12-month outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2024; 95(11):1060-1072. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.24-0093. View

12.

Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller P, Pini Prato G . Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(4):705-10. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565. View

13.

Vincent-Bugnas S, Borie G, Charbit Y . Treatment of multiple maxillary adjacent class I and II gingival recessions with modified coronally advanced tunnel and a new xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 30(2):89-95. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12337. View

14.

Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Jung R, Hurzeler M . Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 41(6):582-92. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. View

15.

Skurska A, Dolinska E, Sulewska M, Milewski R, Pietruski J, Sobaniec S . The assessment of the influence of vertical incisions on the aesthetic outcome of the Miller class I and II recession treatment: a split-mouth study. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42(8):756-763. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12440. View

16.

Cairo F, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Cortellini P, De Paoli S, de Sanctis M . Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: an interrater agreement multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(12):1752-8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100278. View

17.

Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, Nieri M, Saletta D, Cairo F . Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(2):188-201. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.188. View

18.

Hwang D, Wang H . Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(10):1625-34. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060107. View

19.

Miller Jr P . A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5(2):8-13. View

20.

Zuhr O, Rebele S, Cheung S, Hurzeler M . Surgery without papilla incision: tunneling flap procedures in plastic periodontal and implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77(1):123-149. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12214. View