» Articles » PMID: 36462038

Evaluation of a Novel Restorative Protocol to Treat Non-carious Cervical Lesion Associated with Gingival Recession: a 2-year Follow-up Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Objective: To compare 2 different resin composites and 2 adhesive systems used in a new restorative protocol (partial restoration) to treat non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recession type 1 (RT1).

Material And Methods: Eighty combined defects (CDs) were treated with a partial restoration and periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage. The CDs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: NP + TE (n = 20), nanofilled composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive system; NP + UA (n = 20), nanofilled composite and universal adhesive system; MH + TE (n = 20), microhybrid composite and 2-step total-etch adhesive; MH + UA (n = 20), microhybrid composite and universal adhesive. Restorations were assessed using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at 1 week (baseline) and 6, 12, and 24 months. Survival rate, periodontal parameters, dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and aesthetics were also evaluated.

Results: After 24 months, only the MH + TE group did not lose any restoration, with no significant differences between groups. For surface roughness parameter, MH presented 83.3% of the restorations scoring Bravo, whereas NP presented 48.5% of the restorations scoring Bravo. All groups presented restorations with marginal discoloration. All periodontal parameters behaved similarly, regardless of the restorative material. All groups presented significant reductions of dentin hypersensitivity and improved aesthetic perceptions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both resin composites and adhesives tested can be combined for partial restorations to treat CDs.

Clinical Relevance: This new restorative-surgical protocol to treat CDs presents satisfactory outcomes. The partial restorations can be successfully executed with both combinations of adhesives and resin composites evaluated in this investigation. TRN : ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03215615; registration date July 12, 2017.

Citing Articles

A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Bonding Techniques in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions.

Pappa E, Gkavela G, Sampri I, Masouras K, Rahiotis C, Kakaboura A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929622 PMC: 11205971. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60061005.

References
1.
Pini-Prato G, Franceschi D, Cairo F, Nieri M, Rotundo R . Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2010; 81(6):885-90. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090631. View

2.
Santamaria M, Ambrosano G, Casati M, Nociti Jr F, Sallum A, Sallum E . Connective tissue graft and resin glass ionomer for the treatment of gingival recession associated with noncarious cervical lesions: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31(5):e57-63. View

3.
Santamaria M, Mathias-Santamaria I, Fernanda Ferreira Ferraz L, Casarin R, Romito G, Sallum E . Rethinking the decision-making process to treat gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions. Braz Oral Res. 2021; 35(Supp 2):e096. DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0096. View

4.
Santamaria M, Silveira C, Mathias I, Neves F, Dos Santos L, Jardini M . Treatment of single maxillary gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: Randomized clinical trial comparing connective tissue graft alone to graft plus partial restoration. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45(8):968-976. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12907. View

5.
Mathias-Santamaria I, Silveira C, Rossato A, Melo M, Bresciani E, Santamaria M . Single gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion treated by partial restoration and coronally advanced flap with or without xenogenous collagen matrix: A randomized clinical trial evaluating the coverage procedures and.... J Periodontol. 2021; 93(4):504-514. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.21-0358. View