» Articles » PMID: 20383493

Direction-specific Diaphyseal Geometry and Mineral Mass Distribution of Tibia and Fibula: a PQCT Study of Female Athletes Representing Different Exercise Loading Types

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2010 Apr 13
PMID 20383493
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bones adapt to prevalent loading, which comprises mainly forces caused by muscle contractions. Therefore, we hypothesized that similar associations would be observed between neuromuscular performance and rigidity of bones located in the same body segment. These associations were assessed among 221 premenopausal women representing athletes in high-impact, odd-impact, high-magnitude, repetitive low-impact, and repetitive nonimpact sports and physically active referents aged 17-40 years. The whole group mean age and body mass were 23 (5) and 63 (9) kg, respectively. Bone cross sections at the tibial and fibular mid-diaphysis were assessed with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Density-weighted polar section modulus (SSI) and minimal and maximal cross-sectional moments of inertia (Imin, Imax) were analyzed. Bone morphology was described as the Imax/Imin ratio. Neuromuscular performance was assessed by maximal power during countermovement jump (CMJ). Tibial SSI was 31% higher in the high-impact, 19% in the odd-impact, and 30% in the repetitive low-impact groups compared with the reference group (P < 0.005). Only the high-impact group differed from the referents in fibular SSI (17%, P < 0.005). Tibial morphology differed between groups (P = 0.001), but fibular morphology did not (P = 0.247). The bone-by-group interaction was highly significant (P < 0.001). After controlling for height, weight, and age, the CMJ peak power correlated moderately with tibial SSI (r = 0.31, P < 0.001) but not with fibular SSI (r = 0.069, P = 0.313). In conclusion, observed differences in the association between neuromuscular performance and tibial and fibular traits suggest that the tibia and fibula experience different loading environments despite their anatomical vicinity.

Citing Articles

Cross-sectional size, shape, and estimated strength of the tibia, fibula and second metatarsal in female collegiate-level cross-country runners and soccer players.

Sventeckis A, Surowiec R, Fuchs R, Warden S Bone. 2024; 188:117233.

PMID: 39127437 PMC: 11381143. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117233.


Effects of the energy balance transition on bone mass and strength.

Wallace I, Toya C, Munoz M, Meyer J, Busby T, Reynolds A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15204.

PMID: 37709850 PMC: 10502131. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42467-6.


Bone bending strength and BMD of female athletes in volleyball, soccer, and long-distance running.

Rocha-Rangel J, Liang M, Tsai A, Auslander A, Robles P, Kwoh Y Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(10):2213-2223.

PMID: 37256294 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05231-2.


The relationship between bipedalism and growth: A metric assessment in a documented modern skeletal collection (Certosa Collection, Bologna, Italy).

Pietrobelli A, Marchi D, Belcastro M Am J Biol Anthropol. 2023; 177(4):669-689.

PMID: 36787708 PMC: 9299160. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24440.


Accelerometer-based osteogenic indices, moderate-to-vigorous and vigorous physical activity, and bone traits in adolescents.

Haapala E, Rantalainen T, Hesketh K, Rodda C, Duckham R J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022; 22(4):514-523.

PMID: 36458389 PMC: 9716299.