» Articles » PMID: 32877972

Biological Basis of Bone Strength: Anatomy, Physiology and Measurement

Overview
Date 2020 Sep 4
PMID 32877972
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding how bones are innately designed, robustly developed and delicately maintained through intricate anatomical features and physiological processes across the lifespan is vital to inform our assessment of normal bone health, and essential to aid our interpretation of adverse clinical outcomes affecting bone through primary or secondary causes. Accordingly this review serves to introduce new researchers and clinicians engaging with bone and mineral metabolism, and provide a contemporary update for established researchers or clinicians. Specifically, we describe the mechanical and non-mechanical functions of the skeleton; its multidimensional and hierarchical anatomy (macroscopic, microscopic, organic, inorganic, woven and lamellar features); its cellular and hormonal physiology (deterministic and homeostatic processes that govern and regulate bone); and processes of mechanotransduction, modelling, remodelling and degradation that underpin bone adaptation or maladaptation. In addition, we also explore commonly used methods for measuring bone metabolic activity or material features (imaging or biochemical markers) together with their limitations.

Citing Articles

Numerical study of interstitial fluid flow behavior in osteons under dynamic loading.

Liu T, Xiong B, Cui X, Zhang C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):187.

PMID: 39994737 PMC: 11854024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08425-1.


Effect of eccentric-based resistance exercise on bone (re)modelling markers across the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptive cycle.

Guisado-Cuadrado I, Romero-Parra N, Cupeiro R, Elliott-Sale K, Sale C, Peinado A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39738864 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05693-y.


Investigating the potential effect of Holothuria scabra extract on osteogenic differentiation in preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells.

Songkoomkrong S, Nonkhwao S, Duangprom S, Saetan J, Manochantr S, Sobhon P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26415.

PMID: 39488645 PMC: 11531581. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77850-4.


Evaluating the Anti-Osteoporotic Potential of Mediterranean Medicinal Plants: A Review of Current Evidence.

Al-Ajalein A, Ibrahim N, Fauzi M, Mokhtar S, Naina Mohamed I, Shuid A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(10).

PMID: 39458982 PMC: 11510337. DOI: 10.3390/ph17101341.


THE INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS AND CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE ON BONE TURNOVER MARKERS.

Mogos I, Niculescu D, Dusceac R, Poiana C Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2024; 20(1):27-32.

PMID: 39372304 PMC: 11449240. DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2024.27.


References
1.
Parfitt A . Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem. 1994; 55(3):273-86. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240550303. View

2.
Petit M, Beck T, Kontulainen S . Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005; 5(3):213-24. View

3.
Bloomfield S . Disuse osteopenia. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010; 8(2):91-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-010-0013-4. View

4.
Vico L, Collet P, Guignandon A, Lafage-Proust M, Thomas T, Rehaillia M . Effects of long-term microgravity exposure on cancellous and cortical weight-bearing bones of cosmonauts. Lancet. 2000; 355(9215):1607-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02217-0. View

5.
Louis O, Cattrysse E, Scafoglieri A, Luypaert R, Clarys J, De Mey J . Accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing cortical bone cross-sectional area: a cadaver study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010; 34(3):469-72. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d27104. View