» Articles » PMID: 20361036

Gene-gene Interactions Lead to Higher Risk for Development of Type 2 Diabetes in an Ashkenazi Jewish Population

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Apr 3
PMID 20361036
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence has accumulated that multiple genetic and environmental factors play important roles in determining susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although variants from candidate genes have become prime targets for genetic analysis, few studies have considered their interplay. Our goal was to evaluate interactions among SNPs within genes frequently identified as associated with T2D.

Methods/principal Findings: Logistic regression was used to study interactions among 4 SNPs, one each from HNF4A[rs1884613], TCF7L2[rs12255372], WFS1[rs10010131], and KCNJ11[rs5219] in a case-control Ashkenazi sample of 974 diabetic subjects and 896 controls. Nonparametric multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and generalized MDR (GMDR) were used to confirm findings from the logistic regression analysis. HNF4A and WFS1 SNPs were associated with T2D in logistic regression analyses [P<0.0001, P<0.0002, respectively]. Interaction between these SNPs were also strong using parametric or nonparametric methods: the unadjusted odds of being affected with T2D was 3 times greater in subjects with the HNF4A and WFS1 risk alleles than those without either (95% CI = [1.7-5.3]; P<or=0.0001). Although the univariate association between the TCF7L2 SNP and T2D was relatively modest [P = 0.02], when paired with the HNF4A SNP, the OR for subjects with risk alleles in both SNPs was 2.4 [95% CI = 1.7-3.4; P<or=0.0001]. The KCNJ11 variant reached significance only when paired with either the HNF4A or WFSI SNPs: unadjusted ORs were 2.0 [95% CI = 1.4-2.8; P<or=0.0001] and 2.3 [95% CI = 1.2-4.4; P<or=0.0001], respectively. MDR and GMDR results were consistent with the parametric findings.

Conclusions: These results provide evidence of strong independent associations between T2D and SNPs in HNF4A and WFS1 and their interaction in our Ashkenazi sample. We also observed an interaction in the nonparametric analysis between the HNF4A and KCNJ11 SNPs (P<or=0.001), demonstrating that an independently non-significant variant may interact with another variant resulting in an increased disease risk.

Citing Articles

Risk of type 2 diabetes and KCNJ11 gene polymorphisms: a nested case-control study and meta-analysis.

Moazzam-Jazi M, Najd-Hassan-Bonab L, Masjoudi S, Tohidi M, Hedayati M, Azizi F Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):20709.

PMID: 36456687 PMC: 9715540. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24931-x.


, , , and Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Significant Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes in the Polish Population.

Ustianowski P, Malinowski D, Safranow K, Dziedziejko V, Tarnowski M, Pawlik A J Pers Med. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35207731 PMC: 8878167. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020243.


p53 p.Pro72Arg (rs1042522) and Mouse Double Minute 2 (MDM2) Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) 309 Variants and Their Interaction in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia(CLL): A Survey in CLL Patients from Western Iran.

Jalilian N, Maleki Y, Shakiba E, Aznab M, Rahimi Z, Salimi M Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2022; 15(3):160-169.

PMID: 35082997 PMC: 8748241. DOI: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v15i3.6846.


Association Analysis of the HNF4A Common Genetic Variants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Risk.

Azizi S, Sarhangi N, Afshari M, Abbasi D, Aghaei Meybodi H, Hasanzad M Int J Mol Cell Med. 2020; 8(Suppl1):56-62.

PMID: 32351910 PMC: 7175614. DOI: 10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.8.2.56.


Disentangling group specific QTL allele effects from genetic background epistasis using admixed individuals in GWAS: An application to maize flowering.

Rio S, Mary-Huard T, Moreau L, Bauland C, Palaffre C, Madur D PLoS Genet. 2020; 16(3):e1008241.

PMID: 32130208 PMC: 7075643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008241.


References
1.
Minton J, Hattersley A, Owen K, McCarthy M, Walker M, Latif F . Association studies of genetic variation in the WFS1 gene and type 2 diabetes in U.K. populations. Diabetes. 2002; 51(4):1287-90. DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1287. View

2.
Lou X, Chen G, Yan L, Ma J, Zhu J, Elston R . A generalized combinatorial approach for detecting gene-by-gene and gene-by-environment interactions with application to nicotine dependence. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80(6):1125-37. PMC: 1867100. DOI: 10.1086/518312. View

3.
Barroso I, Luan J, Wheeler E, Whittaker P, Wasson J, Zeggini E . Population-specific risk of type 2 diabetes conferred by HNF4A P2 promoter variants: a lesson for replication studies. Diabetes. 2008; 57(11):3161-5. PMC: 2570416. DOI: 10.2337/db08-0719. View

4.
Moore J, Gilbert J, Tsai C, Chiang F, Holden T, Barney N . A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. J Theor Biol. 2006; 241(2):252-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036. View

5.
Hahn L, Ritchie M, Moore J . Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(3):376-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btf869. View