» Articles » PMID: 20352447

Parasitic Contamination in Wastewater and Sludge Samples in Tunisia Using Three Different Detection Techniques

Overview
Journal Parasitol Res
Specialty Parasitology
Date 2010 Mar 31
PMID 20352447
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The limited availability of water results in the reuse of wastewater or sludge. The Tunisian wastewater regulatory guidelines have specific limits for ova of helminths (<1 egg/l) but none for protozoan parasites. We assessed the presence and loads of parasites in 20 samples of raw, treated wastewater and sludge collected from six wastewater treatment plants. Samples were tested by microscopy using the modified Bailenger method (MBM), immunomagnetic separation (IMS) followed by immunofluorescent assay microscopy, and PCR and sequence analysis for the protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia. The seven samples of raw wastewater had a high diversity of helminth and protozoa contamination. Giardia spp., Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Entamoeba coli, Ascaris spp., Enterobius vermicularis, and Taenia saginata were detected by MBM, and protozoan loads were greater than helminth loads. Cryptosporidium and Giardia were also detected by IMS microscopy and PCR. Six of the eight samples of treated wastewater had parasites: helminths (n = 1), Cryptosporidium (n = 1), Giardia (n = 4), and Entamoeba (n = 4). Four of five samples of sludge had microscopically detectable parasites, and all had both Cryptosporidium and Giardia. The genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia were of both human and animal origin. These findings suggest that it may be important to monitor the presence of protozoan parasites in treated wastewater and sludge in Tunisia.

Citing Articles

Can Wastewater Surveillance Enhance Genomic Tracking of Climate-Driven Pathogens?.

Van Poelvoorde L, Karlsson E, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Roosens N Microorganisms. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40005661 PMC: 11858121. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms13020294.


Parasites in Sewage: Legal Requirements and Diagnostic Tools.

Obuch-Woszczatynska O, Bylinska K, Krzyzowska M, Korzekwa K, Baska P Pathogens. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39861047 PMC: 11768300. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens14010086.


Waterborne species and in resources of MENA: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ben Ayed L, Ahmed S, Boughattas S, Karanis P J Water Health. 2024; 22(8):1491-1515.

PMID: 39212283 DOI: 10.2166/wh.2024.107.


A PCR-based method for the diagnosis of in stool samples, specifically designed for clinical application.

Ummarino A, Caputo M, Tucci F, Pezzicoli G, Piepoli A, Gentile A Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:1028988.

PMID: 36466657 PMC: 9712443. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1028988.


Detection of spp. and spp. in Environmental Water Samples: A Journey into the Past and New Perspectives.

Fradette M, Culley A, Charette S Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6).

PMID: 35744692 PMC: 9228427. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061175.


References
1.
Ben Ayed L, Schijven J, Alouini Z, Jemli M, Sabbahi S . Presence of parasitic protozoa and helminth in sewage and efficiency of sewage treatment in Tunisia. Parasitol Res. 2009; 105(2):393-406. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-009-1396-y. View

2.
Thompson R, Monis P . Variation in Giardia: implications for taxonomy and epidemiology. Adv Parasitol. 2004; 58:69-137. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-308X(04)58002-8. View

3.
Xiao L . Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2009; 124(1):80-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018. View

4.
Jiang J, Alderisio K, Singh A, Xiao L . Development of procedures for direct extraction of Cryptosporidium DNA from water concentrates and for relief of PCR inhibitors. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(3):1135-41. PMC: 1065175. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1135-1141.2005. View

5.
Olson M, OHandley R, Ralston B, McAllister T, Thompson R . Update on Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in cattle. Trends Parasitol. 2004; 20(4):185-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.015. View