» Articles » PMID: 35198745

Diagnostic Tools for the Detection of Taeniid Eggs in Different Environmental Matrices: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 24
PMID 35198745
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cestode family Taeniidae consists of the genera and , both of which include zoonotic tapeworms of serious public health importance. Various environmental matrices have been identified from which parasite transmission to animals and humans can occur, and many techniques for detecting taeniid eggs in different environments have been developed. However, the majority lack appropriate validation, and standardized egg isolation procedures are absent. This hampers interstudy comparisons and poses a challenge for future researchers when deciding which technique to implement for assessing taeniid egg contamination in a particular matrix. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to present an overview of the detection methods for taeniid eggs in the environment, to discuss and compare them, and to provide recommendations for future studies. In total, 1814 publications were retrieved from scientific databases, and, ultimately, data were systematically reviewed from 90 papers. The results provide an overview of numerous diagnostic tests for taeniid egg detection in (or on) water, food, soil, insects, objects, and air. These tools could be categorized as either conventional (light microscopy), molecular, or immunodetection tools. The relatively cheap microscopy techniques often lack sensitivity and are unable to identify a taeniid egg at the genus level. Nevertheless, several records ascribed a genus, or even species, to taeniid eggs that had been detected by light microscopy. Molecular and immunodetection tools offer better specificity, but still rely on the preceding egg recovery steps that also affect overall sensitivity. Finally, the majority of the methods lacked any attempt at performance evaluation and standardization, especially at the earlier stages of the analysis (e.g., sampling strategy, storage conditions, egg recovery), and viability was rarely addressed. As such, our review highlights the need for standardized, validated detection tools, that not only assess the extent of environmental contamination, but also the egg genus or species, and address viability.

Citing Articles

Paleoparasitological analysis of a 15th-16th c. CE latrine from the merchant quarter of Bruges, Belgium: Evidence for local and exotic parasite infections.

Ledger M, Poulain M, Deforce K Parasitology. 2024; 151(11):1281-1289.

PMID: 39639590 PMC: 11894012. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182024001100.


Advances in Detecting Cystic Echinococcosis in Intermediate Hosts and New Diagnostic Tools: A Literature Review.

Hajjafari A, Sadr S, Santucciu C, Masala G, Bayat M, Lotfalizadeh N Vet Sci. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38921974 PMC: 11209443. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11060227.


Performance evaluation of protocols for Taenia saginata and Ascaris suum egg recovery from the house fly's gastrointestinal tract and exoskeleton.

De Bock S, Duchateau L, Levecke B, Gabriel S Parasit Vectors. 2023; 16(1):459.

PMID: 38110985 PMC: 10729472. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-06077-5.


Insights into the diagnosis, vaccines, and control of Taenia solium, a zoonotic, neglected parasite.

Hossain M, Shabir S, Toye P, Thomas L, Falcone F Parasit Vectors. 2023; 16(1):380.

PMID: 37876008 PMC: 10594694. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-05989-6.


Detection of in repurposed environmental DNA samples from river water.

Mori K, Imamura A, Hirayama I, Minamoto T PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15431.

PMID: 37334136 PMC: 10276553. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15431.


References
1.
Matsudo K, Inaba T, Kamiya H . Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs by centrifugal flotation technique: preliminary survey of soil left in the ferryboats commuting between Hokkaido Island, where E. multilocularis is endemic, and mainland Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2003; 56(3):118-9. View

2.
Medema G, Schets F, Teunis P, Havelaar A . Sedimentation of free and attached Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64(11):4460-6. PMC: 106669. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.11.4460-4466.1998. View

3.
Lass A, Szostakowska B, Myjak P, Korzeniewski K . The first detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in environmental fruit, vegetable, and mushroom samples using nested PCR. Parasitol Res. 2015; 114(11):4023-9. PMC: 4577536. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4630-9. View

4.
Umhang G, Bastien M, Renault C, Faisse M, Caillot C, Boucher J . A flotation/sieving method to detect Echinococcus multilocularis and Toxocara spp. eggs in soil by real-time PCR. Parasite. 2017; 24:28. PMC: 5523443. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2017029. View

5.
Craig P, Macpherson C, Nelson G . The identification of eggs of Echinococcus by immunofluorescence using a specific anti-oncospheral monoclonal antibody. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986; 35(1):152-8. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.152. View