» Articles » PMID: 20179218

Implications of LINE1 Methylation for Bladder Cancer Risk in Women

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Feb 25
PMID 20179218
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Epigenetic alterations including changes to cellular DNA methylation levels contribute to carcinogenesis and may serve as powerful biomarkers of the disease. This investigation sought to determine whether hypomethylation at the long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE1), reflective of the level of global DNA methylation, in peripheral blood-derived DNA is associated with increased risk of bladder cancer.

Experimental Design: LINE1 methylation was measured from blood-derived DNA obtained from participants of a population-based incident case-control study of bladder cancer in New Hampshire. Bisulfite-modified DNA was pyrosequenced to determine LINE1 methylation status; a total of 285 cases and 465 controls were evaluated for methylation.

Results: Being in the lowest LINE1 methylation decile was associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of bladder cancer [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.12-2.90] in models controlling for gender, age, and smoking, and the association was stronger in women than in men (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.19-5.17 in women; and odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.79-2.74 in men). Among controls, women were more likely to have lower LINE1 methylation than men (P = 0.04), and levels of arsenic in the 90th percentile were associated with reduced LINE1 methylation (P = 0.04).

Conclusions: LINE1 hypomethylation may be an important biomarker of bladder cancer risk, especially among women.

Citing Articles

Biological differences underlying sex and gender disparities in bladder cancer: current synopsis and future directions.

Doshi B, Athans S, Woloszynska A Oncogenesis. 2023; 12(1):44.

PMID: 37666817 PMC: 10477245. DOI: 10.1038/s41389-023-00489-9.


Methylation in Peripheral Blood Cells as a Biomarker for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Siri G, Mosallaei M, Ehtesham N, Rahimi H, Mazarei M, Nasrollahzadeh Sabet M Adv Biomed Res. 2023; 12:174.

PMID: 37564442 PMC: 10410437. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_396_22.


DNA Methylation Modification Map to Predict Tumor Molecular Subtypes and Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancer.

Ye F, Liang Y, Hu J, Hu Y, Liu Y, Cheng Z Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:760369.

PMID: 34926451 PMC: 8678484. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.760369.


Young Breast Cancer: Novel Gene Methylation in WBC.

Noruzinia M, Tavakkoly-Bazzaz J, Ahmadvand M, Azimi F, Dehghanifard A, Khakpour G Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021; 22(8):2371-2375.

PMID: 34452548 PMC: 8629456. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.8.2371.


Genome-Wide Sex and Gender Differences in Cancer.

Lopes-Ramos C, Quackenbush J, DeMeo D Front Oncol. 2020; 10:597788.

PMID: 33330090 PMC: 7719817. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.597788.


References
1.
Baylin S, Ohm J . Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer - a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction?. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(2):107-16. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1799. View

2.
Brown L, Zahm S, Hoover R, Fraumeni Jr J . High bladder cancer mortality in rural New England (United States): an etiologic study. Cancer Causes Control. 1995; 6(4):361-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00051412. View

3.
Karagas M, Tosteson T, Morris J, Demidenko E, Mott L, Heaney J . Incidence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and arsenic exposure in New Hampshire. Cancer Causes Control. 2004; 15(5):465-72. DOI: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036452.55199.a3. View

4.
Dinney C, McConkey D, Millikan R, Wu X, Bar-Eli M, Adam L . Focus on bladder cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004; 6(2):111-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.002. View

5.
Tarantini L, Bonzini M, Apostoli P, Pegoraro V, Bollati V, Marinelli B . Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117(2):217-22. PMC: 2649223. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11898. View