Neural Representation of Abstract and Concrete Concepts: a Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies

Overview

Journal Hum Brain Mapp

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Neurology

Date 2010 Jan 29

PMID 20108224

Citations 147

Authors

Jing Wang

Julie A Conder

David N Blitzer

Svetlana V Shinkareva

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A number of studies have investigated differences in neural correlates of abstract and concrete concepts with disagreement across results. A quantitative, coordinate-based meta-analysis combined data from 303 participants across 19 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies to identify the differences in neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts. Studies that reported peak activations in standard space in contrast of abstract > concrete or concrete > abstract concepts at a whole brain level in healthy adults were included in this meta-analysis. Multilevel kernel density analysis (MKDA) was performed to identify the proportion of activated contrasts weighted by sample size and analysis type (fixed or random effects). Meta-analysis results indicated consistent and meaningful differences in neural representation for abstract and concrete concepts. Abstract concepts elicit greater activity in the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus compared to concrete concepts, while concrete concepts elicit greater activity in the posterior cingulate, precuneus, fusiform gyrus, and parahippocampal gyrus compared to abstract concepts. These results suggest greater engagement of the verbal system for processing of abstract concepts and greater engagement of the perceptual system for processing of concrete concepts, likely via mental imagery.

Citing Articles

Neural correlates of reading aloud on the autism spectrum.

McCabe C, Cahalan S, Pincus M, Rosenberg-Lee M, Graves W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8240.

PMID: 40064934 PMC: 11894215. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88903-7.

When abstract becomes concrete, naturalistic encoding of concepts in the brain.

Kewenig V, Vigliocco G, Skipper J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39636743 PMC: 11620750. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91522.

Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.

Botch T, Finn E J Neurosci. 2024; 44(45).

PMID: 39349055 PMC: 11551891. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024.

Does emotional valence affect cognitive performance and neurophysiological response during decision making? A preliminary study.

Balconi M, Rovelli K Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1408526.

PMID: 39184323 PMC: 11341406. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1408526.

The differential illusion memory for high-associated abstract concepts (DIM-HA) effect.

Marin-Gutierrez A, Diez Villoria E, Gonzalez Martin A Cogn Process. 2024; 25(4):575-586.

PMID: 39153036 PMC: 11541266. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01220-1.

References

Mervis C, John A . Vocabulary abilities of children with Williams syndrome: strengths, weaknesses, and relation to visuospatial construction ability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51(4):967-82. PMC: 2562689. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/071). View

OCraven K, Kanwisher N . Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stiimulus-specific brain regions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 12(6):1013-23. DOI: 10.1162/08989290051137549. View

Johnson M, Raye C, Mitchell K, Touryan S, Greene E, Nolen-Hoeksema S . Dissociating medial frontal and posterior cingulate activity during self-reflection. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008; 1(1):56-64. PMC: 2435374. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsl004. View

Ghio M, Tettamanti M . Semantic domain-specific functional integration for action-related vs. abstract concepts. Brain Lang. 2009; 112(3):223-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.002. View

Borst G, Kosslyn S . Visual mental imagery and visual perception: structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes. Mem Cognit. 2008; 36(4):849-62. DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.4.849. View

Wise R, Chollet F, Hadar U, Friston K, Hoffner E, Frackowiak R . Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Brain. 1991; 114 ( Pt 4):1803-17. DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.4.1803. View

Perani D, Cappa S, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, Collina S, Rosa M . The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study. Brain. 1999; 122 ( Pt 12):2337-44. DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.12.2337. View

Binder J, Westbury C, McKiernan K, Possing E, Medler D . Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(6):905-17. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054021102. View

Wager T, Lindquist M, Kaplan L . Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008; 2(2):150-8. PMC: 2555451. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsm015. View

10.

Graves W, Grabowski T, Mehta S, Gupta P . The left posterior superior temporal gyrus participates specifically in accessing lexical phonology. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 20(9):1698-710. PMC: 2570618. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20113. View

11.

Friederici A, Opitz B, von Cramon D . Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10(7):698-705. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.7.698. View

12.

Caramazza A, Berndt R, Basili A, Koller J . Syntactic processing deficits in aphasia. Cortex. 1981; 17(3):333-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(81)80021-4. View

13.

Martin A, Chao L . Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 11(2):194-201. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00196-3. View

14.

Kuperberg G, West W, Lakshmanan B, Goff D . Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals neuroanatomical dissociations during semantic integration in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 64(5):407-18. PMC: 2651768. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.018. View

15.

Warrington E . The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q J Exp Psychol. 1975; 27(4):635-57. DOI: 10.1080/14640747508400525. View

16.

Harris G, Chabris C, Clark J, Urban T, Aharon I, Steele S . Brain activation during semantic processing in autism spectrum disorders via functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn. 2006; 61(1):54-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.015. View

17.

Noppeney U, Price C . Retrieval of abstract semantics. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(1):164-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.010. View

18.

Hillis A, Wityk R, Tuffiash E, Beauchamp N, Jacobs M, Barker P . Hypoperfusion of Wernicke's area predicts severity of semantic deficit in acute stroke. Ann Neurol. 2001; 50(5):561-6. DOI: 10.1002/ana.1265. View

19.

Goodglass H, Hyde M, Blumstein S . Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. Cortex. 1969; 5(2):104-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(69)80022-5. View

20.

Wise R, Howard D, Mummery C, Fletcher P, Leff A, Buchel C . Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38(7):985-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00152-9. View