» Articles » PMID: 20103678

Prevalence and Heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA Mutations in Primary Colorectal Adenocarcinomas and Their Corresponding Metastases

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jan 28
PMID 20103678
Citations 199
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy is established in patients with wild-type KRAS colorectal carcinoma; however, up to 50% of these patients do not respond to this therapy. To identify the possible causes of this therapy failure, we searched for mutations in different EGFR-dependent signaling proteins and analyzed their distribution patterns in primary tumors and corresponding metastases.

Experimental Design: Tumor tissues, macrodissected from tumor centers, invasion fronts (n = 100), lymph nodes (n = 55), and distant metastases (n = 20), respectively, were subjected to DNA extraction and mutation analysis of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA.

Results: Activating mutations were detected in 41% (KRAS), 7% (BRAF), and 21% (PIK3CA) of the primary tumors. By comparing tumor centers and invasion fronts, the intratumoral heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations was observed in 8%, 1%, and 5% of primary tumors, respectively. Heterogeneity between primary tumors and lymph node metastases was found in 31% (KRAS), 4% (BRAF), and 13% (PIK3CA) of the cases. Heterogeneity between primary tumors and distant metastases was present in two patients (10%) for KRAS and one patient for PIK3CA (5%), but not for BRAF. Discordant results between primary tumors and metastases could markedly be reduced by testing the additional tumor samples.

Conclusions: Failure of EGFR antibody therapy in patients with wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer may result from activating BRAF or PIK3CA mutations and false-negative sequencing results caused by intratumoral heterogeneity. Due to the particularly high rates of heterogeneity between primary tumors and lymph node metastases, the latter are least suitable for diagnostic mutation analysis.

Citing Articles

The Role of KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Biological Insights, Clinical Implications, and Future Therapeutic Perspectives.

Takeda M, Yoshida S, Inoue T, Sekido Y, Hata T, Hamabe A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941797 PMC: 11816235. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030428.


Identification of T cell dysfunction molecular subtypes and exploration of potential immunotherapy targets in BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer.

Gu T, Qi H, Wang J, Sun L, Su Y, Hu H Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):163.

PMID: 39934467 PMC: 11813846. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01930-8.


MRI T2WI-based radiomics combined with KRAS gene mutation constructed models for predicting liver metastasis in rectal cancer.

Ma J, Nie X, Kong X, Xiao L, Liu H, Shi S BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):262.

PMID: 39367333 PMC: 11453062. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01439-6.


Pathway Mutations as Predictive Biomarkers in Middle Eastern Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Benmokhtar S, Laraqui A, Hilali F, Bajjou T, El Zaitouni S, Jafari M Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024; 18:11795549241255651.

PMID: 38798959 PMC: 11128178. DOI: 10.1177/11795549241255651.


Tissue Elasticity as a Diagnostic Marker of Molecular Mutations in Morphologically Heterogeneous Colorectal Cancer.

Plekhanov A, Kozlov D, Shepeleva A, Kiseleva E, Shimolina L, Druzhkova I Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(10).

PMID: 38791375 PMC: 11120711. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105337.