» Articles » PMID: 20097659

A Continuous-state Coalescent and the Impact of Weak Selection on the Structure of Gene Genealogies

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Jan 26
PMID 20097659
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coalescent theory provides an elegant and powerful method for understanding the shape of gene genealogies and resulting patterns of genetic diversity. However, the coalescent does not naturally accommodate the effects of heritable variation in fitness. Although some methods are available for studying the effects of strong selection (Ns >> 1), few tools beyond forward simulation are available for quantifying the impact of weak selection at many sites. Here, we introduce a continuous-state coalescent capable of accurately describing the distortions to genealogies caused by moderate to weak natural selection affecting many linked sites. We calculate approximately the full distribution of pairwise coalescent times, the lengths of coalescent intervals, and the time to the most recent common ancestor of a sample. Weak selection (Ns approximately 1) is found to substantially decrease the tree depth, primarily through a shortening of the lengths of the basal coalescent intervals. Additionally, we demonstrate that only two parameters, population size and the variance of the distribution describing fitness heritability, are sufficient to describe most changes.

Citing Articles

Phylodynamics beyond neutrality: the impact of incomplete purifying selection on viral phylogenies and inference.

Koelle K, Rasmussen D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1919):20230314.

PMID: 39976414 PMC: 11867112. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0314.


Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.

Daigle A, Johri P Evolution. 2024; 79(3):342-363.

PMID: 39565285 PMC: 11879154. DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpae168.


Temporal challenges in detecting balancing selection from population genomic data.

Soni V, Jensen J G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38551137 PMC: 11152078. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae069.


A quantitative genetic model of background selection in humans.

Buffalo V, Kern A PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(3):e1011144.

PMID: 38507461 PMC: 10984650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011144.


Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.

Daigle A, Johri P bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38370745 PMC: 10871249. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.06.579142.


References
1.
Williamson S, Orive M . The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites. Mol Biol Evol. 2002; 19(8):1376-84. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004199. View

2.
Comeron J, Williford A, Kliman R . The Hill-Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations. Heredity (Edinb). 2007; 100(1):19-31. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801059. View

3.
Barton N, Navarro A . Extending the coalescent to multilocus systems: the case of balancing selection. Genet Res. 2002; 79(2):129-39. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672301005493. View

4.
Kuhner M, Yamato J, Felsenstein J . Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics. 1998; 149(1):429-34. PMC: 1460154. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.429. View

5.
Barton N, Etheridge A . The effect of selection on genealogies. Genetics. 2004; 166(2):1115-31. PMC: 1470728. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.1115. View