» Articles » PMID: 29844134

The Effect of Strong Purifying Selection on Genetic Diversity

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2018 May 31
PMID 29844134
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purifying selection reduces genetic diversity, both at sites under direct selection and at linked neutral sites. This process, known as background selection, is thought to play an important role in shaping genomic diversity in natural populations. Yet despite its importance, the effects of background selection are not fully understood. Previous theoretical analyses of this process have taken a backward-time approach based on the structured coalescent. While they provide some insight, these methods are either limited to very small samples or are computationally prohibitive. Here, we present a new forward-time analysis of the trajectories of both neutral and deleterious mutations at a nonrecombining locus. We find that strong purifying selection leads to remarkably rich dynamics: neutral mutations can exhibit sweep-like behavior, and deleterious mutations can reach substantial frequencies even when they are guaranteed to eventually go extinct. Our analysis of these dynamics allows us to calculate analytical expressions for the full site frequency spectrum. We find that whenever background selection is strong enough to lead to a reduction in genetic diversity, it also results in substantial distortions to the site frequency spectrum, which can mimic the effects of population expansions or positive selection. Because these distortions are most pronounced in the low and high frequency ends of the spectrum, they become particularly important in larger samples, but may have small effects in smaller samples. We also apply our forward-time framework to calculate other quantities, such as the ultimate fates of polymorphisms or the fitnesses of their ancestral backgrounds.

Citing Articles

Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Poaceae Cytokinin Response Regulator Gene Family and Functional Characterization of in Drought Stress Tolerance in Rice.

Chen R, Huang Q, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li N, Lu Y Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076580 PMC: 11899991. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051954.


A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.

Barroso G, Ragsdale A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027808 PMC: 11870586. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.19.639084.


Museum genomics reveals temporal genetic stasis and global genetic diversity in .

Lopez L, Lang P, Marciniak S, Kistler L, Latorre S, Haile A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975324 PMC: 11839143. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.06.636844.


Antagonizing regulatory elements of a conserved flowering gene mediate developmental robustness.

Lanctot A, Hendelman A, Udilovich P, Robitaille G, Lippman Z Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(8):e2421990122.

PMID: 39964724 PMC: 11874208. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2421990122.


Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla and Dasiphora (Rosaceae) based on plastid genome.

Li X, Xu H, Yu J, Han Y, Han S, Niu Y BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):176.

PMID: 39930353 PMC: 11809053. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06186-6.


References
1.
Williamson S, Orive M . The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites. Mol Biol Evol. 2002; 19(8):1376-84. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004199. View

2.
Tajima F . Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123(3):585-95. PMC: 1203831. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. View

3.
Rannala B . Gene genealogy in a population of variable size. Heredity (Edinb). 1997; 78 ( Pt 4):417-23. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1997.65. View

4.
Charlesworth B . Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996; 68(2):131-49. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. View

5.
Weissman D, Desai M, Fisher D, Feldman M . The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. Theor Popul Biol. 2009; 75(4):286-300. PMC: 2992471. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2009.02.006. View