» Articles » PMID: 20007171

The Fluid Dynamics of Canine Olfaction: Unique Nasal Airflow Patterns As an Explanation of Macrosmia

Overview
Date 2009 Dec 17
PMID 20007171
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The canine nasal cavity contains hundreds of millions of sensory neurons, located in the olfactory epithelium that lines convoluted nasal turbinates recessed in the rear of the nose. Traditional explanations for canine olfactory acuity, which include large sensory organ size and receptor gene repertoire, overlook the fluid dynamics of odorant transport during sniffing. But odorant transport to the sensory part of the nose is the first critical step in olfaction. Here we report new experimental data on canine sniffing and demonstrate allometric scaling of sniff frequency, inspiratory airflow rate and tidal volume with body mass. Next, a computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in an anatomically accurate three-dimensional model of the canine nasal cavity, reconstructed from high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging scans, reveals that, during sniffing, spatially separate odour samples are acquired by each nostril that may be used for bilateral stimulus intensity comparison and odour source localization. Inside the nose, the computation shows that a unique nasal airflow pattern develops during sniffing, which is optimized for odorant transport to the olfactory part of the nose. These results contrast sharply with nasal airflow in the human. We propose that mammalian olfactory function and acuity may largely depend on odorant transport by nasal airflow patterns resulting from either the presence of a highly developed olfactory recess (in macrosmats such as the canine) or the lack of one (in microsmats including humans).

Citing Articles

Sensory Reconstruction of the Fossil Lorisid : Systematic and Evolutionary Implications.

Anderson H, Lis A, Lundeen I, Silcox M, Lopez-Torres S Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943115 PMC: 11816023. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030345.


Dog skull shape challenges assumptions of performance specialization from selective breeding.

Hebdon N, Ortega A, Orlove A, Wheeler N, Pham M, Nguyen V Sci Adv. 2025; 11(5):eadq9590.

PMID: 39879314 PMC: 11777241. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq9590.


The manipulation of odor availability of training aids used in detection canine training.

Sloan K, Maughan M, Sharpes C, Greubel R, Gallegos S, Miklos A Front Allergy. 2025; 5:1445570.

PMID: 39867433 PMC: 11758185. DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1445570.


Ammonia and ethanol detection via an electronic nose utilizing a bionic chamber and a sparrow search algorithm-optimized backpropagation neural network.

Shi Y, Shi Y, Niu H, Liu J, Sun P PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0309228.

PMID: 39625931 PMC: 11614243. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309228.


Dog sniffing biomechanic responses in an odor detection test of odorants with differing physical properties.

Burnett L, Hebdon N, Stevens P, Moljo M, Waldrop L, DeGreeff L J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 39569970 PMC: 11681339. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae353.


References
1.
Morrison E, Costanzo R . Morphology of the human olfactory epithelium. J Comp Neurol. 1990; 297(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902970102. View

2.
Hornung D, Smith D, Kurtz D, White T, Leopold D . Effect of nasal dilators on nasal structures, sniffing strategies, and olfactory ability. Rhinology. 2001; 39(2):84-7. View

3.
Hahn I, Scherer P, Mozell M . Velocity profiles measured for airflow through a large-scale model of the human nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 75(5):2273-87. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.5.2273. View

4.
Wilson D . Binaral interactions in the rat piriform cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 78(1):160-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.160. View

5.
Uchida N, Mainen Z . Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(11):1224-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn1142. View