» Articles » PMID: 16354744

Numerical Modeling of Turbulent and Laminar Airflow and Odorant Transport During Sniffing in the Human and Rat Nose

Overview
Journal Chem Senses
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2005 Dec 16
PMID 16354744
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human sniffing behavior usually involves bouts of short, high flow rate inhalation (>300 ml/s through each nostril) with mostly turbulent airflow. This has often been characterized as a factor enabling higher amounts of odorant to deposit onto olfactory mucosa than for laminar airflow and thereby aid in olfactory detection. Using computational fluid dynamics human nasal cavity models, however, we found essentially no difference in predicted olfactory odorant flux (g/cm2 s) for turbulent versus laminar flow for total nasal flow rates between 300 and 1000 ml/s and for odorants of quite different mucosal solubility. This lack of difference was shown to be due to the much higher resistance to lateral odorant mass transport in the mucosal nasal airway wall than in the air phase. The simulation also revealed that the increase in airflow rate during sniffing can increase odorant uptake flux to the nasal/olfactory mucosa but lower the cumulative total uptake in the olfactory region when the inspired air/odorant volume was held fixed, which is consistent with the observation that sniff duration may be more important than sniff strength for optimizing olfactory detection. In contrast, in rats, sniffing involves high-frequency bouts of both inhalation and exhalation with laminar airflow. In rat nose odorant uptake simulations, it was observed that odorant deposition was highly dependent on solubility and correlated with the locations of different types of receptors.

Citing Articles

Differences in the anatomy and physiology of the human and rat respiratory tracts and impact on toxicological assessments.

Stucki A, Sauer U, Allen D, Kleinstreuer N, Perron M, Yozzo K Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024; 150:105648.

PMID: 38772524 PMC: 11198871. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105648.


Computational Rhinology: Unraveling Discrepancies between In Silico and In Vivo Nasal Airflow Assessments for Enhanced Clinical Decision Support.

Johnsen S Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(3).

PMID: 38534513 PMC: 10967811. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030239.


An intra-oral flavor detection task in freely moving mice.

Shiotani K, Tanisumi Y, Osako Y, Murata K, Hirokawa J, Sakurai Y iScience. 2024; 27(2):108924.

PMID: 38327778 PMC: 10847684. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108924.


Computational fluid dynamics comparison of the upper airway velocity, pressure, and resistance in cats using an endotracheal tube or a supraglottic airway device.

Zamora-Perarnau C, Malve M, Fernandez-Parra R Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1183223.

PMID: 37818391 PMC: 10561303. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1183223.


Domestic cat nose functions as a highly efficient coiled parallel gas chromatograph.

Wu Z, Jiang J, Lischka F, McGrane S, Porat-Mesenco Y, Zhao K PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(6):e1011119.

PMID: 37384594 PMC: 10309622. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011119.