» Articles » PMID: 19936065

Exceptional Diversity, Non-random Distribution, and Rapid Evolution of Retroelements in the B73 Maize Genome

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Nov 26
PMID 19936065
Citations 165
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent comprehensive sequence analysis of the maize genome now permits detailed discovery and description of all transposable elements (TEs) in this complex nuclear environment. Reiteratively optimized structural and homology criteria were used in the computer-assisted search for retroelements, TEs that transpose by reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate, with the final results verified by manual inspection. Retroelements were found to occupy the majority (>75%) of the nuclear genome in maize inbred B73. Unprecedented genetic diversity was discovered in the long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon class of retroelements, with >400 families (>350 newly discovered) contributing >31,000 intact elements. The two other classes of retroelements, SINEs (four families) and LINEs (at least 30 families), were observed to contribute 1,991 and approximately 35,000 copies, respectively, or a combined approximately 1% of the B73 nuclear genome. With regard to fully intact elements, median copy numbers for all retroelement families in maize was 2 because >250 LTR retrotransposon families contained only one or two intact members that could be detected in the B73 draft sequence. The majority, perhaps all, of the investigated retroelement families exhibited non-random dispersal across the maize genome, with LINEs, SINEs, and many low-copy-number LTR retrotransposons exhibiting a bias for accumulation in gene-rich regions. In contrast, most (but not all) medium- and high-copy-number LTR retrotransposons were found to preferentially accumulate in gene-poor regions like pericentromeric heterochromatin, while a few high-copy-number families exhibited the opposite bias. Regions of the genome with the highest LTR retrotransposon density contained the lowest LTR retrotransposon diversity. These results indicate that the maize genome provides a great number of different niches for the survival and procreation of a great variety of retroelements that have evolved to differentially occupy and exploit this genomic diversity.

Citing Articles

Genome Studies in L. and L. Based on Repeatomic and Cytogenetic Data.

Amosova A, Yurkevich O, Semenov A, Samatadze T, Sokolova D, Artemyeva A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769338 PMC: 11678860. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413575.


Detection and classification of long terminal repeat sequences in plant LTR-retrotransposons and their analysis using explainable machine learning.

Horvath J, Jedlicka P, Kratka M, Kubat Z, Kejnovsky E, Lexa M BioData Min. 2024; 17(1):57.

PMID: 39696434 PMC: 11656987. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-024-00410-z.


DANTE and DANTE_LTR: lineage-centric annotation pipelines for long terminal repeat retrotransposons in plant genomes.

Novak P, Hostakova N, Neumann P, Macas J NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024; 6(3):lqae113.

PMID: 39211332 PMC: 11358816. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqae113.


Chromosome-Scale, De Novo, Phased Genome Assemblies of Three Australian Limes: , , and .

Singh K, Huff M, Liu J, Park J, Rickman T, Keremane M Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38891269 PMC: 11174732. DOI: 10.3390/plants13111460.


Adaptive expansion of ERVK solo-LTRs is associated with Passeriformes speciation events.

Chen G, Yu D, Yang Y, Li X, Wang X, Sun D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3151.

PMID: 38605055 PMC: 11009239. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47501-3.


References
1.
Schnable P, Ware D, Fulton R, Stein J, Wei F, Pasternak S . The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009; 326(5956):1112-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1178534. View

2.
Piegu B, Guyot R, Picault N, Roulin A, Sanyal A, Saniyal A . Doubling genome size without polyploidization: dynamics of retrotransposition-driven genomic expansions in Oryza australiensis, a wild relative of rice. Genome Res. 2006; 16(10):1262-9. PMC: 1581435. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5290206. View

3.
Chou H, Holmes M . DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(12):1093-104. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1093. View

4.
Hedges S . The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap P value in phylogenetic studies. Mol Biol Evol. 1992; 9(2):366-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040725. View

5.
Fu H, Dooner H . Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(14):9573-8. PMC: 123182. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.132259199. View