» Articles » PMID: 35959634

Distinct Composition and Amplification Dynamics of Transposable Elements in Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn.)

Overview
Journal Plant J
Date 2022 Aug 12
PMID 35959634
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) is a basal eudicot plant with a unique lifestyle, physiological features, and evolutionary characteristics. Here we report the unique profile of transposable elements (TEs) in the genome, using a manually curated repeat library. TEs account for 59% of the genome, and hAT (Ac/Ds) elements alone represent 8%, more than in any other known plant genome. About 18% of the lotus genome is comprised of Copia LTR retrotransposons, and over 25% of them are associated with non-canonical termini (non-TGCA). Such high abundance of non-canonical LTR retrotransposons has not been reported for any other organism. TEs are very abundant in genic regions, with retrotransposons enriched in introns and DNA transposons primarily in flanking regions of genes. The recent insertion of TEs in introns has led to significant intron size expansion, with a total of 200 Mb in the 28 455 genes. This is accompanied by declining TE activity in intergenic regions, suggesting distinct control efficacy of TE amplification in different genomic compartments. Despite the prevalence of TEs in genic regions, some genes are associated with fewer TEs, such as those involved in fruit ripening and stress responses. Other genes are enriched with TEs, and genes in epigenetic pathways are the most associated with TEs in introns, indicating a dynamic interaction between TEs and the host surveillance machinery. The dramatic differential abundance of TEs with genes involved in different biological processes as well as the variation of target preference of different TEs suggests the composition and activity of TEs influence the path of evolution.

Citing Articles

Celine, a long interspersed nuclear element retrotransposon, colonizes in the centromeres of poplar chromosomes.

Xin H, Wang Y, Zhang W, Bao Y, Neumann P, Ning Y Plant Physiol. 2024; 195(4):2787-2798.

PMID: 38652695 PMC: 11288735. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiae214.


Dynamics of accessible chromatin regions and subgenome dominance in octoploid strawberry.

Fang C, Jiang N, Teresi S, Platts A, Agarwal G, Niederhuth C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2491.

PMID: 38509076 PMC: 10954716. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46861-0.

References
1.
Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, Bennetzen J, Capy P, Chalhoub B . A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet. 2007; 8(12):973-82. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2165. View

2.
Miyao A, Tanaka K, Murata K, Sawaki H, Takeda S, Abe K . Target site specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion within genes and against insertion in retrotransposon-rich regions of the genome. Plant Cell. 2003; 15(8):1771-80. PMC: 167168. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.012559. View

3.
Ou S, Chen J, Jiang N . Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(21):e126. PMC: 6265445. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky730. View

4.
McCarthy E, McDonald J . LTR_STRUC: a novel search and identification program for LTR retrotransposons. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(3):362-7. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btf878. View

5.
Zhang X, Zhao M, McCarty D, Lisch D . Transposable elements employ distinct integration strategies with respect to transcriptional landscapes in eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(12):6685-6698. PMC: 7337890. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa370. View