» Articles » PMID: 36291883

A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 27
PMID 36291883
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A predictive model including age, PCa family history, biopsy status (initial vs repeat), DRE (normal vs abnormal), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and DRE prostate volume ca-tegory was developed to stratify initial PCa suspicion in 1486 men with PSA > 3 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE, in whom mpMRI followed; 2- to 4-core TRUS-guided biopsies where Prostate Imaging Report and Data System (PI-RADS) > 3 lesions and/or 12-core TRUS systematic biopsies were performed in one academic institution between 1 January 2016−31 December 2019. The csPCa detection rate, defined as International Society of Uro-Pathology grade group 2 or higher, was 36.9%. An external validation of designed BCN-RC 1 was carried out on 946 men from two other institutions in the same metropolitan area, using the same criteria of PCa suspicion and diagnostic approach, yielded a csPCa detection rate of 40.8%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of BCN-RC 1 were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.800−0.846) in the development cohort and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.811−0.863) in the validation cohort (p = 0.447). In both cohorts, BCN-RC 1 exhibited net benefit over performing mpMRI in all men from 8 and 12% risk thresholds, respectively. At 0.95 sensitivity of csPCa, the specificities of BCN-RC 1 were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.22−0.26) in the development cohort and 0.34 (95% CI: 0.31−0.37) in the validation cohort (p < 0.001). The percentages of avoided mpMRI scans were 17.2% in the development cohort and 22.3% in the validation cohort, missing between 1.8% and 2% of csPCa among men at risk of PCa. In summary, BCN-RC 1 can stratify initial PCa suspicion, reducing the demand of mpMRI, with an acceptable loss of csPCa.

Citing Articles

Integrating shear wave elastography and multiparametric MRI for accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.

Jiang W, Lai B, Li X, Liu Y, Xu L, He S Am J Cancer Res. 2025; 15(1):348-362.

PMID: 39949940 PMC: 11815384. DOI: 10.62347/SNMS7524.


The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Early Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Morote J, Paesano N, Picola N, Munoz-Rodriguez J, Ruiz-Plazas X, Munoz-Rivero M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598158 PMC: 11595409. DOI: 10.3390/life14111359.


Validation of the Barcelona-MRI predictive model when PI-RADS v2.1 is used with trans-perineal prostate biopsies.

Morote J, Paesano N, Picola N, Munoz-Rodriguez J, Ruiz-Plazas X, Munoz-Rivero M Int Braz J Urol. 2024; 50(5):595-604.

PMID: 39106115 PMC: 11446555. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0204.


Investigating Efficient Risk-Stratified Pathways for the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Morote J, Borque-Fernando A, Esteban L, Celma A, Campistol M, Miro B J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392564 PMC: 10890536. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020130.


Is multiparametric MRI always needed in biopsy-naïve patients with abnormal digital rectal examination? A single-institutional experience combining clinical and micro-ultrasonography-based factors to optimize prostate cancer detection.

Avolio P, Lazzeri M, Maffei D, Fasulo V, Frego N, Saitta C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):9.

PMID: 38183489 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04722-3.


References
1.
Schoots I, Padhani A, Rouviere O, Barentsz J, Richenberg J . Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 3(1):32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.10.001. View

2.
Remmers S, Kasivisvanathan V, Verbeek J, Moore C, Roobol M . Reducing Biopsies and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans During the Diagnostic Pathway of Prostate Cancer: Applying the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator to the PRECISION Trial Data. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 36:1-8. PMC: 8783039. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.11.002. View

3.
van Poppel H, Roobol M, Chapple C, Catto J, Ndow J, Sonksen J . Prostate-specific Antigen Testing as Part of a Risk-Adapted Early Detection Strategy for Prostate Cancer: European Association of Urology Position and Recommendations for 2021. Eur Urol. 2021; 80(6):703-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.024. View

4.
Roobol M, van Vugt H, Loeb S, Zhu X, Bul M, Bangma C . Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators. Eur Urol. 2011; 61(3):577-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.012. View

5.
Creelman C, Donaldson W . ROC curves for discrimination of linear extent. J Exp Psychol. 1968; 77(3):514-6. DOI: 10.1037/h0025930. View