» Articles » PMID: 22803012

Mucosal Dehiscence Coverage for Dental Implant Using Split Pouch Technique: a Two-stage Approach [corrected]

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Jul 18
PMID 22803012
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Soft tissue recessions frequently cause esthetic disharmony and dissatisfaction. Compared with soft tissue coverage around a tooth, the coverage of an implant site is obviously unpredictable. Particularly in the cases of thin mucosa, a significant greater amount of recession takes place compared to thick mucosa. To overcome this problem, this case report demonstrates a two-step mucosal dehiscence coverage technique for an endosseous implant.

Methods: A 33-year-old female visited us with the chief complaint of dissatisfaction with the esthetics of an exposed implant in the maxillary left cental incisor region. A partial-thickness pouch was constructed around the dehiscence. A subepithelial connective tissue graft was positioned in the apical site of the implant and covered by a mucosal flap with normal tension. At 12 months after surgery, the recipient site was partially covered by keratinized mucosa. However, the buccal interdental papilla between implant on maxillary left central incisor region and adjacent lateral incisor was concave in shape. To resolve the mucosal recession after the first graft, a second graft was performed with the same technique.

Results: An esthetically satisfactory result was achieved and the marginal soft tissue level was stable 9 months after the second graft.

Conclusions: The second graft was able to resolve the mucosal recession after first graft. This two-step approach has the potential to improve the certainty of esthetic results.

Citing Articles

Papilla and pontic area regeneration in patient with gingival smile: A clinical case.

Gomez-Meda R, Torres-Sanchez C, Mareque-Bueno S, Zufia-Gonzalez J, Torres-Lagares D, Gutierrez-Perez J J Clin Exp Dent. 2018; 10(5):e507-e512.

PMID: 29849978 PMC: 5971083. DOI: 10.4317/jced.54859.


Peri-implant mucosal dehiscence coverage with a modified semilunar coronary positioned flap in posterior maxilla: a case report.

Ueno D, Jayawardena J, Kurokawa T Int J Implant Dent. 2016; 1(1):15.

PMID: 27747637 PMC: 5005729. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-015-0017-z.

References
1.
Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom J . Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(2):165-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01210.x. View

2.
Belser U, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard J, Lang N . Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients--a critical appraisal. Periodontol 2000. 1999; 17:132-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00131.x. View

3.
Miller Jr P . A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5(2):8-13. View

4.
Zucchelli G, Mele M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M . Coronally advanced flap with and without vertical releasing incisions for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(7):1083-94. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090041. View

5.
Muller H, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T . Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27(9):621-6. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009621.x. View