» Articles » PMID: 19427303

The Dominance of Warming Rate over Cooling Rate in the Survival of Mouse Oocytes Subjected to a Vitrification Procedure

Overview
Journal Cryobiology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 May 12
PMID 19427303
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The formation of more than trace amounts of ice in cells is lethal. The two contrasting routes to avoiding it are slow equilibrium freezing and vitrification. The cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes by either method continues to be difficult, but there seems a slowly emerging consensus that vitrification procedures are somewhat better for mouse and human oocytes. The approach in these latter procedures is to load cells with high concentrations of glass-inducing solutes and cool them at rates high enough to induce the glassy state. Several devices have been developed to achieve very high cooling rates. Our study has been concerned with the relative influences of warming rate and cooling rate on the survival of mouse oocytes subjected to a vitrification procedure. Oocytes suspended in an ethylene glycol-acetamide-Ficoll-sucrose solution were cooled to -196 degrees C at rates ranging from 37 to 1827 degrees C/min between 20 and -120 degrees C, and for each cooling rate, warmed at rates ranging from 139 to 2950 degrees C/min between -70 and -35 degrees C. The results are unambiguous. If the samples were warmed at the highest rate, survivals were >80% over cooling rates of 187-1827 degrees C/min. If the samples were warmed at the lowest rate, survivals were near 0% regardless of the cooling rate. We interpret the lethality of slow warming to be a consequence of it allowing time for the growth of small intracellular ice crystals by recrystallization.

Citing Articles

A diluted one-step warming protocol: survival of vitrified blastocyst.

Licata E, VerMilyea M, Ducote B, Ferguson T, Bianco C, Gallo M J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 40042768 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03427-3.


Cryopreservation, cryoprotectants, and potential risk of epigenetic alteration.

Sciorio R, Cantatore C, DAmato G, Smith G J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(11):2953-2967.

PMID: 39436484 PMC: 11621268. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03287-3.


Ice formation and its elimination in cryopreservation of oocytes.

Abdelhady A, Mittan-Moreau D, Crane P, McLeod M, Cheong S, Thorne R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18809.

PMID: 39138273 PMC: 11322307. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69528-8.


Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.

Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Campos G, Greco P, Mondrone G, Surbone A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1398049.

PMID: 38827525 PMC: 11140474. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1398049.


Ice formation and its elimination in cryopreservation of oocytes.

Abdelhady A, Mittan-Moreau D, Crane P, McLeod M, Cheong S, Thorne R Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38826214 PMC: 11142364. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4144933/v1.


References
1.
Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo S . Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11(3):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60837-1. View

2.
Kasai M . Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. Mol Biotechnol. 1997; 7(2):173-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02761753. View

3.
Seki S, Mazur P . Kinetics and activation energy of recrystallization of intracellular ice in mouse oocytes subjected to interrupted rapid cooling. Cryobiology. 2008; 56(3):171-80. PMC: 2705660. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.02.001. View

4.
Pedro P, Zhu S, Makino N, Sakurai T, Edashige K, Kasai M . Effects of hypotonic stress on the survival of mouse oocytes and embryos at various stages. Cryobiology. 1997; 35(2):150-8. DOI: 10.1006/cryo.1997.2034. View

5.
Gardner D, Sheehan C, Rienzi L, Katz-Jaffe M, Larman M . Analysis of oocyte physiology to improve cryopreservation procedures. Theriogenology. 2006; 67(1):64-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.012. View