Improving Cell Recovery: Freezing and Thawing Optimization of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Overview

Journal Cells

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Biochemistry
Biophysics
Cell Biology
Molecular Biology

Date 2022 Mar 10

PMID 35269421

Authors

Markus Uhrig

Fernando Ezquer

Marcelo Ezquer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Achieving good cell recovery after cryopreservation is an essential process when working with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Optimized freezing and thawing methods are required for good cell attachment and survival. In this review, we concentrate on these two aspects, freezing and thawing, but also discuss further factors influencing cell recovery such as cell storage and transport. Whenever a problem occurs during the thawing process of iPSC, it is initially not clear what it is caused by, because there are many factors involved that can contribute to insufficient cell recovery. Thawing problems can usually be solved more quickly when a certain order of steps to be taken is followed. Under optimized conditions, iPSC should be ready for further experiments approximately 4-7 days after thawing and seeding. However, if the freezing and thawing protocols are not optimized, this time can increase up to 2-3 weeks, complicating any further experiments. Here, we suggest optimization steps and troubleshooting options for the freezing, thawing, and seeding of iPSC on feeder-free, Matrigel™-coated, cell culture plates whenever iPSC cannot be recovered in sufficient quality. This review applies to two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture and to iPSC, passaged, frozen, and thawed as cell aggregates (clumps). Furthermore, we discuss usually less well-described factors such as the cell growth phase before freezing and the prevention of osmotic shock during thawing.

Citing Articles

Optimisation of cryopreservation conditions, including storage duration and revival methods, for the viability of human primary cells.

Mohamed H, Sundar P, Ridwan N, Cheong A, Mohamad Salleh N, Sulaiman N BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2024; 25(1):20.

PMID: 39350017 PMC: 11441136. DOI: 10.1186/s12860-024-00516-6.

Efficacy assessment of different cryoprotectants for preserving the viability of Enterobacterales strains at - 20 °C.

Tutrina A, Zhurilov P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20843.

PMID: 39242800 PMC: 11379685. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71529-6.

Establishment and Characterization of a Primary Fibroblast Cell Culture from the Amazonian Manatee ().

Tavares F, Martins C, Delella F, Nascimento L, Rodrigues A, Moreira S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38473072 PMC: 10931340. DOI: 10.3390/ani14050686.

Recent Progress in Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cell-Based Therapy for Retinal Disease.

Klymenko V, Gonzalez Martinez O, Zarbin M Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024; 13(4):317-331.

PMID: 38394392 PMC: 11016854. DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szae004.

Flow Cytometric Characterization of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Subpopulations in Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Preparations after Cryopreservation.

Heuer A, Lowhagen S, Uhlig S, Hetjens S, Buttner S, Pflasterer B Transfus Med Hemother. 2023; 50(5):417-427.

PMID: 37899990 PMC: 10601604. DOI: 10.1159/000533624.

References

Beers J, Gulbranson D, George N, Siniscalchi L, Jones J, Thomson J . Passaging and colony expansion of human pluripotent stem cells by enzyme-free dissociation in chemically defined culture conditions. Nat Protoc. 2012; 7(11):2029-40. PMC: 3571618. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2012.130. View

Reichard A, Asosingh K . Best Practices for Preparing a Single Cell Suspension from Solid Tissues for Flow Cytometry. Cytometry A. 2018; 95(2):219-226. PMC: 6375754. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23690. View

Moll G, Alm J, Davies L, Von Bahr L, Heldring N, Stenbeck-Funke L . Do cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells display impaired immunomodulatory and therapeutic properties?. Stem Cells. 2014; 32(9):2430-42. PMC: 4381870. DOI: 10.1002/stem.1729. View

Grasser U, Bubel M, Sossong D, Oberringer M, Pohlemann T, Metzger W . Dissociation of mono- and co-culture spheroids into single cells for subsequent flow cytometric analysis. Ann Anat. 2017; 216:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.10.002. View

Holm F, Strom S, Inzunza J, Baker D, Stromberg A, Rozell B . An effective serum- and xeno-free chemically defined freezing procedure for human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(5):1271-9. PMC: 2854046. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq040. View

Fan Q, Dou M, Mao J, Hou Y, Liu S, Zhao L . Strong Hydration Ability of Silk Fibroin Suppresses Formation and Recrystallization of Ice Crystals During Cryopreservation. Biomacromolecules. 2021; 23(2):478-486. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00700. View

Jose S, Tidu F, Burilova P, Kepak T, Bendickova K, Fric J . The Telomerase Complex Directly Controls Hematopoietic Stem Cell Differentiation and Senescence in an Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Model of Telomeropathy. Front Genet. 2018; 9:345. PMC: 6123533. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00345. View

Fleming Glass K, Longmire E, Hubel A . OPTIMIZATION OF A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE FOR DIFFUSION-BASED EXTRACTION OF DMSO FROM A CELL SUSPENSION. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009; 51(23-24):5749-5757. PMC: 2621076. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.018. View

Chan L, Rice W, Qiu J . Observation and quantification of the morphological effect of trypan blue rupturing dead or dying cells. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227950. PMC: 6980413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227950. View

10.

He X, Park E, Fowler A, Yarmush M, Toner M . Vitrification by ultra-fast cooling at a low concentration of cryoprotectants in a quartz micro-capillary: a study using murine embryonic stem cells. Cryobiology. 2008; 56(3):223-32. PMC: 2728604. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.03.005. View

11.

Wang W, Meng L, Hackett R, Odenbourg R, Keefe D . Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling-rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(11):2374-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2374. View

12.

Fahy G, Wowk B, Wu J, Phan J, Rasch C, Chang A . Cryopreservation of organs by vitrification: perspectives and recent advances. Cryobiology. 2004; 48(2):157-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.02.002. View

13.

Zeiger A, Hinton B, Van Vliet K . Why the dish makes a difference: quantitative comparison of polystyrene culture surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9(7):7354-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.035. View

14.

Martin-Ibanez R, Unger C, Stromberg A, Baker D, Canals J, Hovatta O . Novel cryopreservation method for dissociated human embryonic stem cells in the presence of a ROCK inhibitor. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(12):2744-54. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den316. View

15.

Acker J, McGann L . Protective effect of intracellular ice during freezing?. Cryobiology. 2003; 46(2):197-202. DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2240(03)00025-7. View

16.

Hartung O, Huo H, Daley G, Schlaeger T . Clump passaging and expansion of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells on mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2010; Chapter 1:Unit 1C.10. DOI: 10.1002/9780470151808.sc01c10s14. View

17.

Yuan Y, Yang Y, Tian Y, Park J, Dai A, Roberts R . Efficient long-term cryopreservation of pluripotent stem cells at -80 °C. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34476. PMC: 5046093. DOI: 10.1038/srep34476. View

18.

. A review of best practices of rapid-cooling vitrification for oocytes and embryos: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020; 115(2):305-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.017. View

19.

Wagh V, Meganathan K, Jagtap S, Gaspar J, Winkler J, Spitkovsky D . Effects of cryopreservation on the transcriptome of human embryonic stem cells after thawing and culturing. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2011; 7(3):506-17. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-011-9230-1. View

20.

Correa J, Zavos P . Frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa diluted by slow or rapid dilution method: measurements on occurrence of osmotic shock and sperm viability. Theriogenology. 1995; 44(7):963-71. DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(95)00283-e. View