Opportunities for the Replacement of Animals in the Study of Nausea and Vomiting

Overview

Journal Br J Pharmacol

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2009 Apr 18

PMID 19371333

Citations 30

Authors

A M Holmes

J A Rudd

F D Tattersall

Q Aziz

P L R Andrews

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting are among the most common symptoms encountered in medicine as either symptoms of disease or side effects of treatments. Developing novel anti-emetics and identifying emetic liability in novel chemical entities rely on models that can recreate the complexity of these multi-system reflexes. Animal models (especially the ferret and dog) are the current gold standard; however, the selection of appropriate models is still a matter of debate, especially when studying the subjective human sensation of nausea. Furthermore, these studies are associated with animal suffering. Here, following a recent workshop held to review the utility of animal models in nausea and vomiting research, we discuss the limitations of some of the current models in the context of basic research, anti-emetic development and emetic liability detection. We provide suggestions for how these limitations may be overcome using non-animal alternatives, including greater use of human volunteers, in silico and in vitro techniques and lower organisms.

Citing Articles

A deep learning-based system for automatic detection of emesis with high accuracy in Suncus murinus.

Lu Z, Qiao Y, Huang X, Cui D, Liu J, Ngan M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):209.

PMID: 39930110 PMC: 11811283. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07479-0.

Trust your gut: Establishing confidence in gastrointestinal models - An overview of the state of the science and contexts of use.

Debad S, Allen D, Bandele O, Bishop C, Blaylock M, Brown P ALTEX. 2024; 41(3):402-424.

PMID: 38898799 PMC: 11413798. DOI: 10.14573/altex.2403261.

Evaluating the Presence of Disgust in Animals.

Case T, Stevenson R Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38254434 PMC: 10812441. DOI: 10.3390/ani14020264.

Assessment of Quercetin Antiemetic Properties: In Vivo and In Silico Investigations on Receptor Binding Affinity and Synergistic Effects.

Chowdhury R, Bhuia M, Rakib A, Hasan R, Melo Coutinho H, Araujo I Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38140516 PMC: 10747098. DOI: 10.3390/plants12244189.

Placebo effects on nausea and motion sickness are resistant to experimentally-induced stress.

Jacob C, Olliges E, Haile A, Hoffmann V, Jacobi B, Steinkopf L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9908.

PMID: 37336972 PMC: 10279757. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36296-w.

References

Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann C . Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005; 438(7065):179-84. DOI: 10.1038/nature04216. View

NIEMEGEERS C . The apomorphine antagonism test in dogs. Experimental evidence and critical considerations on specific methodological criteria. Pharmacology. 1971; 6(6):353-64. DOI: 10.1159/000136263. View

Pelchat M, Rozin P . The special role of nausea in the acquisition of food dislikes by humans. Appetite. 1982; 3(4):341-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(82)80052-4. View

Minton N, Swift R, Lawlor C, Mant T, Henry J . Ipecacuanha-induced emesis: a human model for testing antiemetic drug activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993; 54(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1993.109. View

Tiersch T, Griffith J . Apomorphine-induced vomiting in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1988; 91(4):721-5. DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(88)90956-5. View

Cummings D, Overduin J . Gastrointestinal regulation of food intake. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(1):13-23. PMC: 1716217. DOI: 10.1172/JCI30227. View

OSUIDE G, Adejoh P . Effects of apomorphine and its interaction with other drugs in the domestic fowl. Eur J Pharmacol. 1973; 23(1):56-66. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(73)90244-6. View

Rizk A, Hesketh P . Antiemetics for cancer chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. A review of agents in development. Drugs R D. 2000; 2(4):229-35. DOI: 10.2165/00126839-199902040-00001. View

Tajima T, Watanabe N, Kogawa Y, Takiguchi N, Kato J, Ikeda T . Chemotaxis of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans toward cycloheximide and quinine hydrochloride. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005; 91(3):322-4. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.91.322. View

10.

Robichaud A, Savoie C, Stamatiou P, Tattersall F, Chan C . PDE4 inhibitors induce emesis in ferrets via a noradrenergic pathway. Neuropharmacology. 2000; 40(2):262-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00142-8. View

11.

Kasper S, Fuger J, Moller H . Comparative efficacy of antidepressants. Drugs. 1992; 43 Suppl 2:11-22; discussion 22-3. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199200432-00004. View

12.

LAFFAN R, BORISON H . Emetic action of nicotine and lobeline. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1957; 121(4):468-76. View

13.

Golding J, Stott J . Comparison of the effects of a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist and hyoscine (scopolamine) on motion sickness, skin conductance and heart rate. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997; 43(6):633-7. PMC: 2042789. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00606.x. View

14.

Narayanan J, Watts R, Haddad N, Labar D, Li P, Filippi C . Cerebral activation during vagus nerve stimulation: a functional MR study. Epilepsia. 2002; 43(12):1509-14. DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.16102.x. View

15.

Kasparov S, Paton J . Differential effects of angiotensin II in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat--plausible neuronal mechanism. J Physiol. 1999; 521 Pt 1:227-38. PMC: 2269648. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.00227.x. View

16.

Martin M . The severity and pattern of emesis following different cytotoxic agents. Oncology. 1996; 53 Suppl 1:26-31. DOI: 10.1159/000227637. View

17.

Langley C, Aziz Q, Bountra C, Gordon N, Hawkins P, Jones A . Volunteer studies in pain research--opportunities and challenges to replace animal experiments: the report and recommendations of a Focus on Alternatives workshop. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(2):467-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.030. View

18.

Chen M, Wu S, Reeve Jr J, Rozengurt E . Bitter stimuli induce Ca2+ signaling and CCK release in enteroendocrine STC-1 cells: role of L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006; 291(4):C726-39. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00003.2006. View

19.

BORISON H . Effect of ablation of medullary emetic chemoreceptor trigger zone on vomiting responses to cerebral intraventricular injection of adrenaline, apomorphine and pilocarpine in the cat. J Physiol. 1959; 147(1):172-7. PMC: 1357013. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006232. View

20.

Williams R, Boeckeler K, Graf R, Muller-Taubenberger A, Li Z, Isberg R . Towards a molecular understanding of human diseases using Dictyostelium discoideum. Trends Mol Med. 2006; 12(9):415-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.003. View