» Articles » PMID: 25557265

Visually Induced Nausea Causes Characteristic Changes in Cerebral, Autonomic and Endocrine Function in Humans

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 2015 Jan 6
PMID 25557265
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An integrated understanding of the physiological mechanisms involved in the genesis of nausea remains lacking. We aimed to describe the psychophysiological changes accompanying visually induced motion sickness, using a motion video, hypothesizing that differences would be evident between subjects who developed nausea in comparison to those who did not. A motion, or a control, stimulus was presented to 98 healthy subjects in a randomized crossover design. Validated questionnaires and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were used for the assessment of anxiety and nausea. Autonomic and electrogastrographic activity were measured at baseline and continuously thereafter. Plasma vasopressin and ghrelin were measured in response to the motion video. Subjects were stratified into quartiles based on VAS nausea scores, with the upper and lower quartiles considered to be nausea sensitive and resistant, respectively. Twenty-eight subjects were exposed to the motion video during functional neuroimaging. During the motion video, nausea-sensitive subjects had lower normogastria/tachygastria ratio and cardiac vagal tone but higher cardiac sympathetic index in comparison to the control video. Furthermore, nausea-sensitive subjects had decreased plasma ghrelin and demonstrated increased activity of the left anterior cingulate cortex. Nausea VAS scores correlated positively with plasma vasopressin and left inferior frontal and middle occipital gyri activity and correlated negatively with plasma ghrelin and brain activity in the right cerebellar tonsil, declive, culmen, lingual gyrus and cuneus. This study demonstrates that the subjective sensation of nausea is associated with objective changes in autonomic, endocrine and brain networks, and thus identifies potential objective biomarkers and targets for therapeutic interventions.

Citing Articles

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Visually Induced Motion Sickness: An eLORETA Study.

Molefi E, McLoughlin I, Palaniappan R Brain Topogr. 2024; 38(1):11.

PMID: 39487878 PMC: 11531436. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01088-6.


Motion sickness resistant people showed suppressed steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) under vection-inducing stimulation.

Wei Y, Wang Y, Okazaki Y, Kitajo K, So R Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):1525-1537.

PMID: 39104676 PMC: 11297854. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-09991-7.


Feature extraction method of EEG based on wavelet packet reconstruction and deep learning model of VR motion sickness feature classification and prediction.

Luo S, Ren P, Wu J, Wu X, Zhang X PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305733.

PMID: 39028732 PMC: 11259303. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305733.


Adverse Effects of Meditation: Autonomic Nervous System Activation and Individual Nauseous Responses During Samadhi Meditation in the Czech Republic.

Kotherova S, Cigan J, Stepankova L, Vyskocilova M, Littnerova S, Ejova A J Relig Health. 2024; 63(6):4840-4860.

PMID: 38605255 PMC: 11576787. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02024-5.


Prediction and detection of virtual reality induced cybersickness: a spiking neural network approach using spatiotemporal EEG brain data and heart rate variability.

Yang A, Kasabov N, Cakmak Y Brain Inform. 2023; 10(1):15.

PMID: 37438494 PMC: 10338414. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00192-w.


References
1.
Yen M, Lo L . Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach. Nurs Res. 2002; 51(1):59-62. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200201000-00009. View

2.
Stern R, Koch K, Stewart W, Lindblad I . Spectral analysis of tachygastria recorded during motion sickness. Gastroenterology. 1987; 92(1):92-7. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90843-2. View

3.
Morrow G, Hickok J, Andrews P, Stern R . Reduction in serum cortisol after platinum based chemotherapy for cancer: a role for the HPA axis in treatment-related nausea?. Psychophysiology. 2002; 39(4):491-5. DOI: 10.1017.S0048577202991195. View

4.
Bullmore E, Suckling J, Overmeyer S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Taylor E, Brammer M . Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1109/42.750253. View

5.
Yen Pik Sang F, Golding J, Gresty M . Suppression of sickness by controlled breathing during mildly nauseogenic motion. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2003; 74(9):998-1002. View