» Articles » PMID: 19359491

Synthetic and Structural Studies on Syringolin A and B Reveal Critical Determinants of Selectivity and Potency of Proteasome Inhibition

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Apr 11
PMID 19359491
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Syrbactins, a family of natural products belonging either to the syringolin or glidobactin class, are highly potent proteasome inhibitors. Although sharing similar structural features, they differ in their macrocyclic lactam core structure and exocyclic side chain. These structural variations critically influence inhibitory potency and proteasome subsite selectivity. Here, we describe the total synthesis of syringolin A and B, which together with enzyme kinetic and structural studies, allowed us to elucidate the structural determinants underlying the proteasomal subsite selectivity and binding affinity of syrbactins. These findings were used successfully in the rational design and synthesis of a syringolin A-based lipophilic derivative, which proved to be the most potent syrbactin-based proteasome inhibitor described so far. With a K(i)' of 8.65 +/- 1.13 nM for the chymotryptic activity, this syringolin A derivative displays a 100-fold higher potency than the parent compound syringolin A. In light of the medicinal relevance of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer compounds, the present findings may assist in the rational design and development of syrbactin-based chemotherapeutics.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of Cepafungin Enabled by Biocatalytic C-H Oxidations.

Amatuni A, Shuster A, Abegg D, Adibekian A, Renata H ACS Cent Sci. 2023; 9(2):239-251.

PMID: 36844499 PMC: 9951290. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c01219.


Comparative genomics and genomic diversity of Pseudomonas syringae clade 2b-a in Australia.

Djitro N, Roach R, Mann R, Campbell P, Rodoni B, Gambley C BMC Microbiol. 2022; 22(1):278.

PMID: 36411421 PMC: 9677677. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-022-02678-9.


Revisiting Proteasome Inhibitors: Molecular Underpinnings of Their Development, Mechanisms of Resistance and Strategies to Overcome Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance.

Leonardo-Sousa C, Carvalho A, Guedes R, Fernandes P, Aniceto N, Salvador J Molecules. 2022; 27(7).

PMID: 35408601 PMC: 9000344. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072201.


Syrbactin-class dual constitutive- and immuno-proteasome inhibitor TIR-199 impedes myeloma-mediated bone degeneration in vivo.

Tandon V, Vala R, Chen A, Sah R, Patel H, Pirrung M Biosci Rep. 2022; 42(2).

PMID: 35088066 PMC: 8837819. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20212721.


Docking-generated multiple ligand poses for bootstrapping bioactivity classifying Machine Learning: Repurposing covalent inhibitors for COVID-19-related TMPRSS2 as case study.

Hatmal M, Abuyaman O, Taha M Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19:4790-4824.

PMID: 34426763 PMC: 8373588. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.023.


References
1.
Kaiser M, Groll M, Renner C, Huber R, Moroder L . The core structure of TMC-95A is a promising lead for reversible proteasome inhibition. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2002; 41(5):780-3. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020301)41:5<780::aid-anie780>3.0.co;2-v. View

2.
Sterz J, von Metzler I, Hahne J, Lamottke B, Rademacher J, Heider U . The potential of proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008; 17(6):879-95. DOI: 10.1517/13543784.17.6.879. View

3.
Amrein H, Makart S, Granado J, Shakya R, Schneider-Pokorny J, Dudler R . Functional analysis of genes involved in the synthesis of syringolin A by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B301 D-R. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004; 17(1):90-7. DOI: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.1.90. View

4.
Brunger A, Adams P, Clore G, DeLano W, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve R . Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998; 54(Pt 5):905-21. DOI: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. View

5.
Kaiser M, Groll M, Siciliano C, Assfalg-Machleidt I, Weyher E, Kohno J . Binding mode of TMC-95A analogues to eukaryotic 20S proteasome. Chembiochem. 2004; 5(9):1256-66. DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200400096. View