» Articles » PMID: 19305972

Comparative Evaluation of the Tendon-bone Interface Contact Pressure in Different Single- Versus Double-row Suture Anchor Repair Techniques

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2009 Mar 24
PMID 19305972
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the time zero contact pressure over a defined rotator cuff footprint using different repair and stitch techniques in an established sheep model. Forty fresh-frozen sheep shoulders were randomly assigned to five repair groups: single-row repair using simple stitches (SRA-s), single-row repair using horizontal mattress stitches (SRA-m), and single-row repair using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches (SRA-ama). Double-row repair was either performed with a combination of simple and horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-sm) or with arthroscopic Mason-Allen/horizontal mattress stitches (DRA-amam). Investigations were performed using a pressure-sensitive film system. The average contact pressure and pressure pattern were measured for each group. Contact pressure was lowest in SRA-m followed by SRA-s. SRA-ama showed highest contact pressure of all single-row treatment groups (P < 0.05). DRA-amam presented the highest overall contact pressure (P < 0.05), whereas DRA-sm exerted contact pressure equal to that of SRA-ama. Both double-row techniques showed the most expanded pressure pattern. Average contact pressures for the more complex single- and double-row techniques utilizing arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches were greater than were those of the repair techniques utilizing simple and horizontal mattress stitches. However, the contact pattern between the anchors could be increased by using the double-row technique, resulting in more footprint coverage compared to patterns utilizing the single-row techniques. These results support the use of the more complex arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches and may improve the environment for healing of the repaired rotator cuff tendon.

Citing Articles

Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Results of Patients Treated With Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair for Rotator Cuff Tear.

Aydin M, Firat A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71004.

PMID: 39507138 PMC: 11539916. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71004.


Current concepts in the evolution of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Tokish J, Hawkins R JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 1(2):75-83.

PMID: 37588146 PMC: 10426701. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.01.004.


Autograft Long Head Biceps Tendon Can Be Used as a Scaffold for Biologically Augmenting Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Colbath G, Murray A, Siatkowski S, Pate T, Krussig M, Pill S Arthroscopy. 2021; 38(1):38-48.

PMID: 34126215 PMC: 8665938. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.064.


Rotator Cuff Injuries in Tennis Players.

Alrabaa R, Lobao M, Levine W Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020; 13(6):734-747.

PMID: 32827301 PMC: 7661672. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-020-09675-3.


Arthroscopic Knotless Remplissage for the Treatment of Hill-Sachs Lesions Using the PASTA Bridge Configuration.

Hirahara A, Andersen W, Yamashiro K Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8(3):e275-e281.

PMID: 31019885 PMC: 6471291. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.11.001.


References
1.
Scheibel M, Habermeyer P . A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(3):330-3. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50079. View

2.
Schneeberger A, von Roll A, Kalberer F, Jacob H, Gerber C . Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(12):2152-60. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200212000-00005. View

3.
Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons P, Warner J . Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(5):519-26. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.32930. View

4.
Katsuragi R, Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Keira M, Kaneda K . The effect of nonphysiologically high initial tension on the mechanical properties of in situ frozen anterior cruciate ligament in a canine model. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1177/03635465000280012001. View

5.
Gerber C, Schneeberger A, Beck M, Schlegel U . Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(3):371-80. View