» Articles » PMID: 20049605

Initial Load-to-failure and Failure Analysis in Single- and Double-row Repair Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repair

Overview
Date 2010 Jan 6
PMID 20049605
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This experimental study aimed to compare the load-to-failure rate and stiffness of single- versus double-row suture techniques for repairing rotator cuff lesions using two different suture materials. Additionally, the mode of failure of each repair was evaluated.

Method: In 32 sheep shoulders, a standardized tear of the infraspinatus tendon was created. Then, n = 8 specimen were randomized to four repair methods: (1) Double-row Anchor Ethibond coupled with polyester sutures, USP No. 2; (2) Double-Row Anchor HiFi with polyblend polyethylene sutures, USP No. 2; (3) Single-Row Anchor Ethibond coupled with braided polyester sutures, USP No. 2; and (4) Single-Row Anchor HiFi with braided polyblend polyethylene sutures, USP No. 2. Arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches were placed (single-row) and combined with medial horizontal mattress stitches (double-row). All specimens were loaded to failure at a constant displacement rate on a material testing machine.

Results: Group 4 showed lowest load-to-failure result with 155.7 +/- 31.1 N compared to group 1 (293.4 +/- 16.1 N) and group 2 (397.7 +/- 7.4 N) (P < 0.001). Stiffness was highest in group 2 (162 +/- 7.3 N/mm) and lowest in group 4 (84.4 +/- 19.9 mm) (P < 0.001). In group 4, the main cause of failure was due to the suture cutting through the tendon (n = 6), a failure case observed in only n = 1 specimen in group 2 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: A double-row technique combined with arthroscopic Mason-Allen/horizontal mattress stitches provides high initial failure strength and may minimize the risk of the polyethylene sutures cutting through the tendon in rotator cuff repair when a single load force is used.

Citing Articles

An in-vitro study of rotator cuff tear and repair kinematics using single- and double-row suture anchor fixation.

Kedgley A, Shore B, Athwal G, Johnson J, Faber K Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013; 7(2):46-51.

PMID: 23960362 PMC: 3743030. DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.114224.

References
1.
Scheibel M, Habermeyer P . A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(3):330-3. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50079. View

2.
Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C . Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy. 2008; 25(1):4-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.018. View

3.
Mazzocca A, Millett P, Guanche C, Santangelo S, Arciero R . Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(12):1861-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505279575. View

4.
Wust D, Meyer D, Favre P, Gerber C . Mechanical and handling properties of braided polyblend polyethylene sutures in comparison to braided polyester and monofilament polydioxanone sutures. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(11):1146-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.013. View

5.
Trantalis J, Boorman R, Pletsch K, Lo I . Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(6):727-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.009. View