» Articles » PMID: 23555038

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow--adaptation to Change in Memory-guided Visual Search

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 5
PMID 23555038
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual search for a target object can be facilitated by the repeated presentation of an invariant configuration of nontargets ('contextual cueing'). Here, we tested adaptation of learned contextual associations after a sudden, but permanent, relocation of the target. After an initial learning phase targets were relocated within their invariant contexts and repeatedly presented at new locations, before they returned to the initial locations. Contextual cueing for relocated targets was neither observed after numerous presentations nor after insertion of an overnight break. Further experiments investigated whether learning of additional, previously unseen context-target configurations is comparable to adaptation of existing contextual associations to change. In contrast to the lack of adaptation to changed target locations, contextual cueing developed for additional invariant configurations under identical training conditions. Moreover, across all experiments, presenting relocated targets or additional contexts did not interfere with contextual cueing of initially learned invariant configurations. Overall, the adaptation of contextual memory to changed target locations was severely constrained and unsuccessful in comparison to learning of an additional set of contexts, which suggests that contextual cueing facilitates search for only one repeated target location.

Citing Articles

Distributed attention beats the down-side of statistical context learning in visual search.

Zinchenko A, Conci M, Hauser J, Muller H, Geyer T J Vis. 2024; 20(7):4.

PMID: 38755793 PMC: 7424102. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.7.4.


No evidence for contextual cueing beyond explicit recognition.

Meyen S, Vadillo M, von Luxburg U, Franz V Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):907-930.

PMID: 37845567 PMC: 11192686. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02358-3.


Mission impossible? Spatial context relearning following a target relocation event depends on cue predictiveness.

Geyer T, Zinchenko A, Seitz W, Balik M, Muller H, Conci M Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(1):148-155.

PMID: 37434045 PMC: 10867038. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02328-9.


Rethinking statistical learning as a continuous dynamic stochastic process, from the motor systems perspective.

Vaskevich A, Torres E Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1033776.

PMID: 36425474 PMC: 9679382. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1033776.


Why Are Acquired Search-Guiding Context Memories Resistant to Updating?.

Geyer T, Seitz W, Zinchenko A, Muller H, Conci M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:650245.

PMID: 33732200 PMC: 7956950. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650245.


References
1.
Huang T, Grossberg S . Cortical dynamics of contextually cued attentive visual learning and search: spatial and object evidence accumulation. Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(4):1080-112. DOI: 10.1037/a0020664. View

2.
Conci M, Zellin M, Muller H . Whatever after next? Adaptive predictions based on short- and long-term memory in visual search. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:409. PMC: 3475347. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00409. View

3.
van Asselen M, Castelo-Branco M . The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009; 71(1):76-81. DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.1.76. View

4.
Zellin M, Conci M, von Muhlenen A, Muller H . Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 73(7):2065-76. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0175-x. View

5.
Junge J, Scholl B, Chun M . How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Vis cogn. 2008; 15(1):1-11. PMC: 2519016. DOI: 10.1080/13506280600859706. View