» Articles » PMID: 19212545

The Effect of Different Fiber Concentrations on the Surface Roughness of Provisional Crown and Fixed Partial Denture Resin

Overview
Journal Eur J Dent
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Feb 13
PMID 19212545
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate surface roughness in provisional crown acrylics, after polishing, reinforced with different concentrations of glass fibers.

Methods: A total of 48 disk-shaped specimens were prepared using autopolymerizing acrylic resin. These specimens were divided into four groups according to the level of glass fiber added: Group A (no fiber), Group B (0.5%), Group C (1%) and Group D (2%). After polishing the specimens, an average surface roughness (Ra) value was calculated using a profilometer from four randomly selected points on the surface.

Results: A significant difference was determined among the surface roughness values of provisional crown resins to which different concentrations of fiber had been added (P<.001). Tukey's test was then used to perform paired comparisons of the data between the different groups, and a significant difference was found between Group A (no fiber) and the other groups, between Group B (0.5%) and Group D (2%) and between Group C (1%) and Group D. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between Group B and Group C.

Conclusions: The reinforcement of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resin with glass fibers increases surface roughness.

Citing Articles

Effects of Different Orientation Angle, Size, Surface Roughness, and Heat Curing on Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Cement Mortar With/Without Glass Fiber in Powder-Based 3DP.

Shakor P, Nejadi S, Paul G, Gowripalan N 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023; 10(2):330-355.

PMID: 37123523 PMC: 10133986. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0067.


Bacterial Adhesion of to Dental Material Surfaces.

Kozmos M, Virant P, Rojko F, Abram A, Rudolf R, Raspor P Molecules. 2021; 26(4).

PMID: 33670043 PMC: 7926644. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26041152.


Biological and Chemo-Physical Features of Denture Resins.

Cervino G, Cicciu M, Herford A, Germana A, Fiorillo L Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(15).

PMID: 32731445 PMC: 7435594. DOI: 10.3390/ma13153350.


Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite crowns in pulp-treated primary molars: 12-month results.

Mohammadzadeh Z, Parisay I, Mehrabkhani M, Madani A, Mazhari F Eur J Dent. 2017; 10(4):522-528.

PMID: 28042269 PMC: 5166310. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.195177.


Effect of polyester fiber reinforcement on the mechanical properties of interim fixed partial dentures.

Gopichander N, Halini Kumarai K, Vasanthakumar M Saudi Dent J. 2015; 27(4):194-200.

PMID: 26644754 PMC: 4642189. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.03.002.


References
1.
Haselton D, Diaz-Arnold A, Dawson D . Effect of storage solution on surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13(4):227-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04039.x. View

2.
Auschill T, Arweiler N, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L . The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002; 110(1):48-53. DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x. View

3.
Ramos Jr V, Runyan D, Christensen L . The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76(1):94-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90348-0. View

4.
Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G . Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004; 12(2):75-9. View

5.
Young H, Smith C, Morton D . Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85(2):129-32. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.112797. View