Bacterial Adhesion of Porphyromonas Gingivalis on Provisional Fixed Prosthetic Materials

Overview

Journal Dent Res J (Isfahan)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2011 Mar 31

PMID 21448445

Citations 8

Authors

Mustafa Zortuk

Servet Kesim

Esma Kaya

Hatice Ozbilge

Kerem Kilic

Ozlem Colgecen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: When provisional restorations are worn for long term period, the adhesion of bacteria becomes a primary factor in the development of periodontal diseases. The aims of this study were to evaluate the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of four different provisional fixed prosthodon-tic materials.

Methods: Ten cylindrical specimens were prepared from bis-acrylic composites (PreVISION CB and Protemp 3 Garant), a light-polymerized composite (Revotek LC), and a polymethyl methacrylate-based (Dentalon) provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. Surface roughness was assessed by profilometry. The bacterial adhesion test was applied using Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and spectro-fluorometric method. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Dunnett t-tests.

Results: All tested materials were significantly rougher than glass (P < 0.05). Revotek LC had the greatest fluorescence intensity, PreVISION and Protemp 3 Garant had moderate values and all of them had significantly more bacterial adhesion compared to glass (P < 0.05). Dentalon had the lowest fluorescence intensity among the provisional fixed prosthodontic materials.

Conclusion: The quantity of bacterial adhesion and surface roughness differed among the assessed provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. The light-polymerized provisional material Revotek LC had rougher surface and more bacterial adhesion compared with the others.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Provisional Crowns Fabricated With Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Conventional Acrylic Resin: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Singh P, Shenoy A, Nallaswamy D, Maiti S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64469.

PMID: 39135823 PMC: 11318720. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64469.

Biocompatibility and biofilm formation on conventional and CAD/CAM provisional implant restorations.

Parakaw T, Ruangsawasdi N, Dararat P, Phruksaniyom C, Srihirun S, Petchmedyai P BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):718.

PMID: 37798682 PMC: 10552236. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03468-z.

Piranha-etched titanium nanostructure reduces biofilm formation in vitro.

Mukaddam K, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Fasler-Kan E, Ruggiero S, Alhawasli F, Kisiel M Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(10):6187-6197.

PMID: 37653076 PMC: 10560173. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05235-4.

Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses.

Pawar R, Narote P, Gawai K, Amte M, Singh S, Sonkesriya S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022; 14(Suppl 1):S812-S815.

PMID: 36110822 PMC: 9469461. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22.

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Porcelain Fused to Metal and Stainless-Steel Crown Following Ultrasonic and Hand Scaling: A Comparative Study.

Bagde H, Fatima N, Sharma P, Sharma A, Agrawal G, Agrawal P Cureus. 2022; 14(7):e27134.

PMID: 36017283 PMC: 9392901. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27134.

References

Quirynen M, Bollen C . The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995; 22(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb01765.x. View

Borchers L, Tavassol F, Tschernitschek H . Surface quality achieved by polishing and by varnishing of temporary crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82(5):550-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70053-3. View

Andrian E, Grenier D, Rouabhia M . Porphyromonas gingivalis-epithelial cell interactions in periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(5):392-403. DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500502. View

Haselton D, Diaz-Arnold A, Dawson D . Effect of storage solution on surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13(4):227-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04039.x. View

Holt S, Kesavalu L, Walker S, Genco C . Virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Periodontol 2000. 1999; 20:168-238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00162.x. View

Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G . Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004; 12(2):75-9. View

Lamont R, Jenkinson H . Life below the gum line: pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998; 62(4):1244-63. PMC: 98945. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1244-1263.1998. View

Sham A, Chu F, Chai J, Chow T . Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(5):447-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0022391304001283. View

Quirynen M, Bollen C, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D . The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(2):169-78. View

10.

Tran S, Rudney J . Multiplex PCR using conserved and species-specific 16S rRNA gene primers for simultaneous detection of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34(11):2674-8. PMC: 229384. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2674-2678.1996. View

11.

Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W . Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31(3):278-85. DOI: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01233.x. View

12.

Tacir I, Kama J, Zortuk M, Eskimez S . Flexural properties of glass fibre reinforced acrylic resin polymers. Aust Dent J. 2006; 51(1):52-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00401.x. View

13.

Zortuk M, Kilic K, Uzun G, Ozturk A, Kesim B . The effect of different fiber concentrations on the surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resin. Eur J Dent. 2009; 2(3):185-90. PMC: 2635901. View

14.

Guler A, Kurt S, Kulunk T . Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(5):453-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.001. View

15.

Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G . Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(6):461-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60146-2. View

16.

Bunetel L, Guerin J, Agnani G, Piel S, Pinsard H, CORBEL J . In vitro study of the effect of titanium on porphyromonas gingivalis in the presence of metronidazole and spiramycin. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(22):3067-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00054-0. View

17.

Maalhagh-Fard A, Wagner W, Pink F, Neme A . Evaluation of surface finish and polish of eight provisional restorative materials using acrylic bur and abrasive disk with and without pumice. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(6):734-9. View

18.

Svanberg M, Mjor I, Orstavik D . Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res. 1990; 69(3):861-4. DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690030601. View

19.

Sen D, Goller G, Issever H . The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(5):527-32. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129335. View

20.

Heintze S, Forjanic M, Rousson V . Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater. 2005; 22(2):146-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013. View