Effect of Different Provisional Cement Remnant Cleaning Procedures Including Er:YAG Laser on Shear Bond Strength of Ceramics

Overview

Journal J Adv Prosthodont

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2012 Dec 14

PMID 23236570

Citations 2

Authors

Mustafa Zortuk

Hasan Onder Gumus

Halil Ibrahim Kilinc

Ali Riza Tuncdemir

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of provisional cement removal by different dentin cleaning protocols (dental explorer, pumice, cleaning bur, Er:YAG laser) on the shear bond strength between ceramic and dentin.

Materials And Methods: In total, 36 caries-free unrestored human third molars were selected as tooth specimens. Provisional restorations were fabricated and cemented with eugenol-free provisional cement. Then, disc-shaped ceramic specimens were fabricated and randomly assigned to four groups of dentin cleaning protocols (n = 9). Group 1 (control): Provisional cements were mechanically removed with a dental explorer. Group 2: The dentin surfaces were treated with a cleaning brush with pumice Group 3: The dentin surfaces were treated with a cleaning bur. Group 4: The provisional cements were removed by an Er:YAG laser. Self-adhesive luting cement was used to bond ceramic discs to dentin surfaces. Shear bond strength (SBS) was measured using a universal testing machine at a 0.05 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed using a Kolmogorov Smirnov, One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests to perform multiple comparisons (α=0.05).

Results: THE DENTIN CLEANING METHODS DID NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE SBS OF CERAMIC DISCS TO DENTIN AS FOLLOWS: dental explorer, pumice, cleaning bur, and Er:YAG laser.

Conclusion: The use of different cleaning protocols did not affect the SBS between dentin and ceramic surfaces.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors with Porcelain Laminate Veneers Experienced during Cementation: A Review.

Assaf A, Azer S, Sfeir A, Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(14).

PMID: 37512206 PMC: 10381715. DOI: 10.3390/ma16144932.

Effect of temporary cements and their removal methods on the bond strength of indirect restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ding J, Jin Y, Feng S, Chen H, Hou Y, Zhu S Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 27(1):15-30.

PMID: 36422719 PMC: 9877054. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04790-6.

References

Ergun G, Cekic I, Lassila L, Vallittu P . Bonding of lithium-disilicate ceramic to enamel and dentin using orthotropic fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64(5):293-9. DOI: 10.1080/00016350600758750. View

Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H . Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J Oral Sci. 2005; 47(1):9-13. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.47.9. View

Ayad M, Rosenstiel S, Hassan M . Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75(2):122-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90087-6. View

Sarac D, Sarac Y, Kulunk S, Kulunk T . Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(4):363-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.009. View

Yap A, Shah K, Loh E, Sim S, Tan C . Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001; 26(6):556-61. View

Terata R . Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement--study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J. 1993; 12(1):18-28. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.12.18. View

Usumez A, Usumez S, Orhan M . Effect of complete dentures on dynamic measurement of changing head position: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(4):394-400. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00414-1. View

Omae M, Shinnou Y, Tanaka K, Abo T, Nakata T, Suzuki K . XPS analysis of the dentin irradiated by Er: YAG laser. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28(4):471-6. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.471. View

Zortuk M, Kilic K, Uzun G, Ozturk A, Kesim B . The effect of different fiber concentrations on the surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resin. Eur J Dent. 2009; 2(3):185-90. PMC: 2635901. View

10.

Carvalho C, Bauer J, Loguercio A, Reis A . Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19(3):144-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00087.x. View

11.

Bachmann M, Paul S, Luthy H, Scharer P . Effect of cleaning dentine with soap and pumice on shear bond strength of dentine-bonding agents. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24(6):433-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00110.x. View

12.

Button G, Moon P, BARNES R, Gunsolley J . Effect of preparation cleaning procedures on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59(2):145-8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90004-2. View

13.

Abo-Hamar S, Federlin M, Hiller K, Friedl K, Schmalz G . Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(9):794-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.015. View

14.

Chaiyabutr Y, Kois J . The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(5):556-63. DOI: 10.2341/07-141. View